m****4
发帖数: 827 | 1 吃的parking ticket给的是离消防栓不够15尺
但我确定那天park的时候超过15尺，后来发现吃ticket后马上拍了照，然后网上submit
过去做online hearing。可恶的是hearing结果维持原判：
In this case, respondent submitted no other documentary evidence and called
no other witnesses. Respondent did not state how respondent knew the vehicle
's distance from the fire hydrant when respondent parked the vehicle and,
that omission was extraordinary. Further, although the tape measure shows l5
feet, none of the photos show any street name or any metes and bounds
information and the respondent did not state when after service the pictures
were taken. Further, the vehicle was so far away from the hydrant in the
pictures that part of it was on crosswalk lines. It is more than highly
unlikely that the vehicle was cited for fire hydrant when it was l5 feet
from it. The Notice of Violation was not answered with factual, detailed,
persuasive evidence and, dismissal was not warranted.
我觉得回复中说”Respondent did not state how respondent knew the vehicle's
distance from the fire hydrant when respondent parked the vehicle and, that
omission was extraordinary"一点都不make sense。难道要说我park车的时候就已经
用尺子量过超过15feet吗？
另外，那个地方在路中间，怎么可能照到street name？我原来hearing中的证词的确没
提到什么时候照的照片， 但照片上是有显示时间的，觉得这个hearing的结果简直没认
真看。不过当时的确忘了找证人。。。
大家觉得我要不要在appeal这个hearing decision？我觉得就是给罚单的人看我是外州
牌照乱开的ticket（最近在纽约短期工作），那个位置每天都有人在停。
谢谢建议。 |
|
