j**l
发帖数: 429 | 1 想学着大家找点硬证据.
在Web of Science上发表的文章和被引用的期刊影响因子, 然后在同类期刊中排名, 发
现大部分是在top 25%, 也即所谓的Q1 (当然有一些在10%内).
请教一下, top25%写在Petition Letter是是不是太弱了? 需要换个统计方式?
谢谢 | I******t
发帖数: 1619 | | j**l
发帖数: 429 | | T****O
发帖数: 407 | 4 My suggestions to self-invented 'Top' statistics:
1. Don't. Adjudicators may not be in your major, but they are Not dumb.
They are professionals in their own right. They read these sort of things
everyday. Chances are low that you are doing something completely new to
them.
2. Go for it. If you must and being denied is mostly inconsequential. | g****x
发帖数: 3862 | 5 试试用不同的标准，5year if,eigenfactor, citation #,or different data base ,
JCR or SJR
【在 j**l 的大作中提到】
: 想学着大家找点硬证据.
: 在Web of Science上发表的文章和被引用的期刊影响因子, 然后在同类期刊中排名, 发
: 现大部分是在top 25%, 也即所谓的Q1 (当然有一些在10%内).
: 请教一下, top25%写在Petition Letter是是不是太弱了? 需要换个统计方式?
: 谢谢
|
|
