l***d
发帖数: 1828 | 1 去查了一下chronicle的我们领域的faculty productively index, 最早的也只有2006
年的结果，不过我2006年时候还没什么结果，该怎么比较？
我对比了一下，表格里面是06年的前三年的publication和06年前四年的citation,有点
疑惑，那些table的citation是指前四年总citation还是前四年发的文章在这四年里的
citation?
谢谢各位了。 | l***d
发帖数: 1828 | | S******g
发帖数: 1469 | | c******e
发帖数: 350 | 4 请问, 这个chronicle faculty productively index怎么查的? | l*****d
发帖数: 7963 | 5 For each discipline, Academic Analytics assigns a weight to each variable.
Publications, which include journal articles, citations of those articles,
and in many cases, books, count as 60 points out of 100. Books are included
in six of the eleven broad fields: Business; Education; Family, Consumer and
Human Sciences; Health Professions Sciences; Humanities; and Social and
Behavioral Sciences but not in Agricultural Sciences; Biological and
Biomedical Sciences; Engineering; Natural Resources and Conservation; and
Physical and Mathematical Sciences Books that were published from 2002 to
2006 were recorded using Baker and Taylor's database. When books are
included, their weight is five times that of journal articles for the
Humanities and three times that of a journal article in other broad fields.
Journal articles are counted for the years 2004, 2005, and 2006. Citation
counts cover a four year span so refer to citations to articles published
for the years 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. The index uses Scopus, an abstract-
and-citation database that covers more than 15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
Grants count as 30 points out of the 100, if they meet a threshold of
importance in a particular discipline — that more than 10 percent of the
programs in that discipline have received a federal grant. Grant data from
2004, 2005, and 2006 were collected from the National Institutes of Health,
the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Education, the
National Endowment for the Humanities, and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, NOAA, and from three programs in the Department of Energy.
Awards and honors count as 10 points out of 100, as long as more than 10
percent of the programs in the discipline have received awards. Data are
collected from the Web sites of 357 organizations that grant awards and
honors and are matched to names and programs.
以上是关于chronicle faculty productively index的介绍。您可以把您的数据按照上
述的方法计算出自己的得分，然后进行比对。但是要说明您的数据来源是from哪一年to
哪一年。最好同时说明一下在您所属的领域chronicle faculty productively index是
一个稳定的不随时间变化太多的指数。 | S******g
发帖数: 1469 | 6 。“最好同时说明一下在您所属的领域chronicle faculty productively index是
一个稳定的不随时间变化太多的指数。”
这个证据何在？如何找？ | l***d
发帖数: 1828 | 7 我的新疑惑，那些table的citation是指前四年总citation还是指前四年发的文章在这
四年里的citation?我看了说明，觉得不是很清楚。想问问大家的理解呢?谢谢。 | l*****d
发帖数: 7963 | 8 每个领域都有一些不同的数据来源吧，具体问题具体分析
【在 S******g 的大作中提到】
: 。“最好同时说明一下在您所属的领域chronicle faculty productively index是
: 一个稳定的不随时间变化太多的指数。”
: 这个证据何在？如何找？
| c******e
发帖数: 350 | 9 Sorry, but where to find these tools?
Is there a website to calculate?
included
and
【在 l*****d 的大作中提到】
: For each discipline, Academic Analytics assigns a weight to each variable.
: Publications, which include journal articles, citations of those articles,
: and in many cases, books, count as 60 points out of 100. Books are included
: in six of the eleven broad fields: Business; Education; Family, Consumer and
: Human Sciences; Health Professions Sciences; Humanities; and Social and
: Behavioral Sciences but not in Agricultural Sciences; Biological and
: Biomedical Sciences; Engineering; Natural Resources and Conservation; and
: Physical and Mathematical Sciences Books that were published from 2002 to
: 2006 were recorded using Baker and Taylor's database. When books are
: included, their weight is five times that of journal articles for the
| l***d
发帖数: 1828 | 10
anyone knows?thanks
【在 l***d 的大作中提到】
: 我的新疑惑，那些table的citation是指前四年总citation还是指前四年发的文章在这
: 四年里的citation?我看了说明，觉得不是很清楚。想问问大家的理解呢?谢谢。
| c******e
发帖数: 350 | 11 Is it only helpful if your citation is very high?
So that you could compare your citation to faculty of top institute?
Thanks! |
|
