y***l
发帖数: 1095 | 1 正打算写contribution这部分，看到模板有不同的写法，想问一下关于几个要点怎么分
配的问题。
我同事的1A RFE刚过不久，所以我本来是想按他RFE contribution部分来写的：
1. My original scientific research work has been published in top
scientific journals and conferences with very high impacts.
2. My original scientific research work has been selected to present orally
in the largest international conference in my field.
3. My original scientific research work has been widely cited in
publications on top scientific journals by experts in my field from leading
research institutes and universities around the world.
4. My major significant contributions have drawn wide attention and
provoked widespread public commentary by experts in my field.
5. My original scientific research work has been implemented by currently
used USA patent and Medicine Company
6. Experts’ testimony that explains in detail how my original scientific
contributions are of major significance to my field.
我的问题是：他的前三条基本上我都已经在我的authorship里面详细阐述了，难道在
contribution里又要再详细写一遍吗？ 他的RFE里是详细写的，因为authorship过了，
所以他就没再写authorship,相当于把authorship的东西就写在contribution RFE里了
。。那我这种不是RFE的，要怎么办呢？总不能把authorship里的东西再说一遍，或者
是把authorship里的东西删掉一些，搬到contribution这里来？
还有，我看到另一类型模板基本上就是按照自己的project来的
A.1 Dr. XXX is the first scientist to DO SOMETHING in FIELD1 with
programmable TECHNIQUE (Based on first-authored paper #1)
A.2 Dr. XXX independently developed the technology to fabricate SOMETHINGs
in FIELD2 for the first time (Based on first-authored paper #2)
A.3 Dr. XXX demonstrated for the first time ever the successful manipulation
of SOMETHING in a FIELD3 device (Based on first-authored paper #3)
A.4 Dr. XXX’s developed technology is being implemented by COMPANY Inc.
A.5 Dr. XXX’s original contribution is broadly cited by researchers
worldwide and favorably treated (summary of citations, comparison with
average citation rates in the field -- comparison table in Exhibits,
emphasize the fact that many citations are in highly regarded review papers)
A.6 Dr. XXX’s research projects were supported in the amount of
approximately $4M from competitive funding agencies
大概是这种。。。然后每一个PROJECT分开说，发了什么文章，引用了多少次，多少媒
体报道，推荐人怎么说，等等这样。
现在很纠结，用哪种模板好。。。请前辈指点一下，谢谢！ |
L**S
发帖数: 7833 | 2 My original scientific research work has been widely cited in
publications on top scientific journals by experts in my field from leading
research institutes and universities around the world.
==================
可以modify一下这个部分，强调 my contribution was broadly RECOGNIZED and
highly ACCLAIMED by my scientific peers |
L**S
发帖数: 7833 | |
b****j
发帖数: 2414 | 4 Ａuthorship的东西再总结提取精华写在contribution，不用再重现图表。好东西有必
要多提提，万一ＩＯ在ａｕｔｈｏｒｓｈｉｐ里面没有仔细看呢？
我综合了两个模板，先总结各个ｐｒｏｊｅｃｔ和它们的最突出闪光点，然后再总结ｃ
ｏｎｔｒｉｂｕｔｉｏｎ的各个闪光点。 |
y***l
发帖数: 1095 | 5 那得有几条啊？每一条就是一两段对吗？不用再有太多DETAIL了对吗？
【在 b****j 的大作中提到】
: Ａuthorship的东西再总结提取精华写在contribution，不用再重现图表。好东西有必
: 要多提提，万一ＩＯ在ａｕｔｈｏｒｓｈｉｐ里面没有仔细看呢？
: 我综合了两个模板，先总结各个ｐｒｏｊｅｃｔ和它们的最突出闪光点，然后再总结ｃ
: ｏｎｔｒｉｂｕｔｉｏｎ的各个闪光点。
|
S*********n
发帖数: 895 | 6 有结构层次的可能更易读吧
orally
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 7.5
【在 y***l 的大作中提到】
: 正打算写contribution这部分，看到模板有不同的写法，想问一下关于几个要点怎么分
: 配的问题。
: 我同事的1A RFE刚过不久，所以我本来是想按他RFE contribution部分来写的：
: 1. My original scientific research work has been published in top
: scientific journals and conferences with very high impacts.
: 2. My original scientific research work has been selected to present orally
: in the largest international conference in my field.
: 3. My original scientific research work has been widely cited in
: publications on top scientific journals by experts in my field from leading
: research institutes and universities around the world.
|
