w*********g
发帖数: 30882 | 1 刘晓波背后那些可笑的外国朋友
2010年诺贝尔和平奖背后是地缘政治议程
威廉·恩道尔[1]
著作：《霸权背后》、《金融海啸》、《石油战争》、《粮食危机》
在一个极其微妙而敏感的时刻，挪威议会诺贝尔和平奖委员会把2010年诺贝尔和平奖授
予了中国的刘晓波。此时此刻，美国财政部长蒂莫西·盖特纳正在向中国政府施压，试
图迫使人民币大幅升值——其实这对于深陷困境的美元毫无帮助，但是对中国的经济却
会造成危害。诺贝尔和平奖成了上演闹剧的舞台，这里演出的是华盛顿反对中国的战略
大戏——不断升级、长期施压的战略行动。
把诺贝尔今年度和平奖发给刘晓波，显然不是什么巧合。准确地说，这是一项精心安排
的长期战略中的一个行动。这个战略不是挪威议会部分议员的战略，而是世界霸权——
美国精英集团的战略。这个战略的目标，就是要阻止中国成为一个对世界经济具有主导
性的主权国家的进程。他们现在要的事，是给中国“磨掉棱角”。
在世界媒体中上演的诺贝尔和平奖闹剧，就是这一战略精心策划的一个部分——竭力让
中国在世界面前“丢脸”。这是一场更深层次的博弈，华盛顿直接或间接控制的非政府
组织等织成的网络相互密切配合，把“人权”当作华盛顿地缘政治的一个武器来使用。
这一次的诺贝尔和平奖战略不会比2008年3月的西藏暴乱更成功，不会比2009年7月中国
新疆的骚乱更成功，也不会比2007年在中国邻国缅甸的动乱（“藏红色革命”）更成功
。这几次行动，都是华盛顿精心策划、秘密鼓动，或者通过亲达赖喇嘛集团的人发起的
。参与其中的那些不成气候的集团对此都很清楚。他们处心积虑地所做的一切，就是要
制造一种国际气候，把中华人民共和国的形象，从伙伴和“朋友”转换成“敌人”。不
过从华盛顿的角度来看，这是一个风险非常高的战略，或者是陷于地缘政治困境的美国
在孤注一掷。
刘晓波那些不靠谱的可笑的外国朋友
英语中也有这样一句老话:“物以类聚，人以群分”。因为我没有见过刘晓波本人，也
没有读过他的著作，所以我没有资格谈论刘晓波的为人。不过来认识一下刘晓波的那些
滑稽可笑外国朋友，可能更重要。
在国际笔会网站[2]上的正式履历中，刘晓波曾是国际笔会独立中国笔会中心的会长，
他担任此职一直到2007年。现在他还是该组织的理事会成员。这个国际笔会并不是某些
作家们碰巧的集合，它是英美鼓吹人权和民主的非政府组织和私人组织网络的不可分割
的一部分，出资人掏钱给这些组织，是要用它们来达到自己的地缘政治目标。
国际笔会自称 “世界上最早的人权组织”，成立于20世纪20年代，地点在伦敦，出面
的人物是英帝国的两名地缘政治战略家：G.B.萧伯纳和H.G.威尔士。笔会的资金来源于
美欧私人基金会和公司所组成网络，其中有布卢姆伯格集团、挪威外交部和“其他不愿
透露姓名的赞助者”。它说它要创造一种叫做“世界文化”的东西，从这里我们立刻嗅
到了英美“全球治理”的某种气味，这是戴维·洛克菲勒的“世界新秩序”那种气味。
国际笔会被覆盖着一个更大的“国际言论自由与交流”（简称IFEX）的网络中，那个
IFEX的地点在加拿大，有大约90个成员，都是非政府组织，其宗旨听起来很高尚：捍卫
“表达自由权”。“国际言论自由与交流”的成员中，有一个是总部设在华盛顿的自由
之家（由美国国务院资助），另一个是国家民主基金会（NED）。
自由之家是为了推动美国参加二战而于1941年创建的，其后在冷战期间，是美国情报局
指挥的反共宣传工具。这个非政府组织最近在华盛顿指挥的制造动乱的行动中却是指挥
的中心，如西藏、缅甸、乌克兰、格鲁吉亚、塞尔维亚、吉尔吉斯斯坦等，一旦这些国
家地区不遵循让美国某些精英满意的政策，自由之家就要行动了。自由之家的上一任主
席是中央情报局前局长詹姆斯・伍尔西。自由之家主席包柏漪，是2008年西藏暴
乱时的西藏国际委员会中的一个头面人物。自由之家曾与乔治·索罗斯的开放社会研究
所、挪威外交部紧密合作，推动了例如2005年吉尔吉斯斯坦“郁金香革命”这样的行动
，那些项目都有华盛顿提供的经费支持。吉尔吉斯斯坦郁金香革命的结果，是亲华盛顿
的独裁者和毒枭K·巴基耶夫上台执政。[3]
国际笔会与刘晓波的联系暂时到此。下面看一看，诺贝尔和平奖为什么给了他。
1989年天安门鲜为人知的故事
根据诺贝尔奖委员会的公告，刘晓波获奖的主要理由，是他在1989年天安门抗议中扮演
了主角，还有2008年他和别人共同起草的《零八宪章》。《时代》杂志称该宪章为“在
受压制的共产主义中国呼吁民主政治改革的宣言”。[4]
1989年春天，据说刘晓波从其任教的美国常青藤大学——哥伦比亚大学乘飞机回到中国
，在北京天安门广场学生抗议活动中扮演了主角。对世界上的许多人来说，1989年6月
的天安门广场事件，至今还是美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）当年播出的那个形象。很少
人知道，1989年6月的天安门广场事件，是美国情报机构干涉中华人民共和国内部事务
和实施日后所谓的“颜色革命”的最早的尝试。后来由华盛顿操纵的类似的颜色革命，
有塞尔维亚反对米洛舍维奇的革命、乌克兰的所谓橙色革命、格鲁吉亚的玫瑰革命，以
及其他地缘政治性的动乱，目的都是促成有利于华盛顿的政权更迭。
正如在我的专著《霸权背后：美国全方位主导战略》中详细描述过的那样，天安门事件
之后，敦促当时的美国总统乔治·布什对中国政府施加强力制裁的人，是美国驻华大使
李洁明。他是布什的老朋友、中央情报局官员。如果要说李洁明是动乱的承办人，理由
是很充分的。波士顿的阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦研究所的吉恩·夏普（《非暴力战争》教材
的作者）在天安门抗议升级之前，恰好也在北京。据报道，夏普的组织和课本，特别是
他的专著《基于平民的防御：后军事武器系统》，在塞尔维亚、乌克兰和格鲁吉亚的颜
色革命中，都曾发挥过很重要的作用。夏普1989年6月正好在北京，这或许是巧合……
也许不是。[5]
有消息说，1989年当天安门广场上发生各种事件之时，一个以乔治・索罗斯为首
的基金会（即“中国改革开放基金会”），与美国中央情报局一起参与了1989年6月天
安门事件期间推翻中国的活动，后因受到中国官方指控而被迫停止活动。[6]
恰巧在同一个时候，美国情报机构也积极地行动，推翻了苏联，回忆一下这个事实很有
用。因此，刘晓波的决定——放弃他在纽约的名牌大学哥伦比亚大学前途远大的学术事
业，在1989年的春天，毅然投入进天安门事件的中心，极有可能至少得到过他那些很不
对头的美国朋友们的怂恿。
刘晓波在起草《零八宪章》扮演的角色、他选择的时间，也很令人好奇。当中国在对它
的经济进行现代化时、当中国允许在笔者看来比许多西方所谓的民主国家更多个人自由
的时候，刘晓波提高了他的政治批评的调子。2008年，他相当清楚地知道，中国官方对
西藏和和新疆可能发生的动乱活动极其敏感；这关系到在奥运会期间使北京丢面子。美
国国务院承认，2008年由达赖喇嘛所支持的西藏抗议和暴乱，是中华人民共和国历史上
最严重的内部动乱。如果认真严肃对待这样的事情，那么这个时刻就不是更多要求放开
不同政见的时机。它暗示，刘晓波的行动也许出自另一个更深的计划，而那个计划是他
那些很不对头的外国朋友提出来的。
诺贝尔奖提名
在这种情况下，是谁正式提名刘晓波为2010年诺贝尔和平奖候选人，就很值得注意了—
—提名人竟然是达赖喇嘛！他自己通过国家民主基金会，长期接受美国政府中央情报局
和国会的大笔金钱。达赖喇嘛提名刘晓波这个事实，足以说明今年诺贝尔和平奖的本质
——地缘政治。
如果我们再关注一下提名刘晓波的其他人，那名单读起来就像戴维·洛克菲勒那个极为
秘密的三边委员会的国际会员名单。那个三边委员会是由超级精英、只有邀请才能入会
的一个团体，由北美洲、欧洲和日本的300个强势人物所组成。中国未被邀请参加这个
严格挑选会员的俱乐部。
除了达赖喇嘛，提名刘晓波的人中，还有捷克外交部长和亲王卡雷尔·施瓦岑贝格、世
界贸易组织前主管迈克·穆尔、俄国反对自由市场政客G·A·叶林斯基。
卡雷尔亲王、穆尔和叶林斯基——他们也都是精英组成的三边委员会的成员；我们从这
里得到了什么暗示？他们有计划地把诺贝尔和平奖送刘晓波。
支持北约的捷克前总统瓦茨拉夫·哈维尔是乔治·索罗斯赞助的人权观察组织国际委员
会主席。他也参加了刘晓波获奖的提名。哈维尔是卡雷尔亲王的亲密朋友，他注意到，
刘晓波的《零八宪章》是捷克《七七宪章》的翻版。该宪章曾得到美国的暗中支持，在
推翻20世纪80年代的苏联时派上了用场。[7] 这一切都在暗示，这是一个结合紧密的哈
维尔俱乐部，其会费是由华盛顿来支付的。
有关挪威议会诺贝尔委员会的情况很少被公布过。他们的网站强调，他们是完全独立的
，但是如果看一看获奖者名单，这话就不那么可信了。那个名单包括达赖喇嘛、昂山素
季（缅甸被监禁的反对派领导人）、巴拉克·奥巴马（执政仅两周时获奖，而在他获得
提名之前，他在阿富汗战争的军事集结非常显而易见），以及亨利・基辛格（20
世纪70年代任美国国务卿，支持拉丁美洲独裁者镇压成性的随意杀戮平民的政权）。当
然，当华尔街银行和英美权势集团决定借全球性变暖而加紧行骗的时候，诺贝尔和平奖
就授予了声名狼藉的联合国政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)和全球性变暖鼓吹者戈尔
。只要把事实公开，证据是确凿无疑的：诺贝尔和平奖是北约集团的一个地缘政治工具
，向不和它一心一意的那些政府施加压力。挪威是北约的一个创始成员国，并且与美国
的领导集团有着极为密切的联系。
更加深刻的地缘政治意义
美国强势集团为什么选择这个时刻通过授予刘晓波和平奖来给中华人民共和国施加更大
的压力？这个问题可以明显地见之于中国近来成为强大、充满活力、不断增长的世界经
济体而同时美国跌入其200多年历史中最严重的经济萧条这一事实。
美国官方战略政策仍然是2002年9月《美国国家安全战略》里所详尽阐述的内容，有时
又被称为“布什主义”，称“冷战后时代美国的政治和军事任务将是保证不允许超级大
国对手在西欧、亚洲或者前苏联的领土上出现”。这种方案的制定一直是1992年以来五
角大楼明确奉行的金科玉律。[8]
为什么中国被盯上了？这只是因为中国今天作为在经济和政治上一个不断崛起的世界因
素，与外国进行联盟，用以支持在苏丹或伊朗这些华盛顿控制较少的地方的这种发展势
头。在这点上，中国作为一个积极稳定国家的存在，对于美国来说是一个不断增长的战
略威胁，并不是因为中国威胁华盛顿在全球发起的战争。真正的威胁是，当中国、俄国
、中亚的上海合作组织国家以及不计其数的其他国家走向一个更加多样化的多极世界的
时候，美国和那些遵从其战略的国家失去全球性霸权地位。根据布什主义和美国战略地
缘政治学，趁现在还来得及的时候，必须不惜一切代价防止那种事态的进一步发展。联
合国安全理事会在美国强大的压力下最近逐步加大对伊朗的制裁，与其说是与伊朗及其
核野心有关，还不如说是与伊朗是中国的一个战略经济伙伴这一事实有关。
诺贝尔和平奖颁发给刘晓波，离开一个促进和平的姿态很远。此事最好从它的真实情况
来看：这是一个被美国引导的、非政府组织孵育的、反对中国主权的、非正规战争宣言
的一部分。英国200多年的均势地缘政治学中，有一条这样的公理，即霸权帝国必须时
刻寻找两个潜在敌人之中较弱小的一个，然后与之联合，攻破强者。美国从2001年以来
对印度的政策、2008年以来对中国的政策，恰恰如此，即寻求与弱小但更有用的印度结
盟，结为军事和战略联盟，对抗中国在亚洲特别是巴基斯坦和阿富汗的战略利益。
北约在阿富汗（远离北约的北大西洋地区）的正式存在，应该发出的是这样的信号，即
所有这一切并不是为了促进民主或表达自由，而是一个不断式微的霸权孤注一掷地试用
它武库里的一切武器，来扭转现实。刘晓波只是他们这一努力的一个顺手的工具而已，
是无数工具之一，就像达赖喇嘛或华盛顿支持的世界维吾尔代表大会的热比娅·卡德尔
一样。值此美国的可信度与它的经济稳定同时急剧恶化之际，他们这样干大概是无济于
事的。
注： | z***y
发帖数: 13818 | | l******t
发帖数: 55733 | 3
刘3百进去肯定后全招了。TG的国安不是吃素的。
【在 z***y 的大作中提到】
: 可笑在何处？
| z***y
发帖数: 13818 | 4 so what?
招了就可笑了？
【在 l******t 的大作中提到】
:
: 刘3百进去肯定后全招了。TG的国安不是吃素的。
| l******t
发帖数: 55733 | 5
恩，就可笑了
【在 z***y 的大作中提到】
: so what?
: 招了就可笑了？
| m***6
发帖数: 8479 | | d*********t
发帖数: 4393 | 7 威廉·恩道尔
F. William Engdahl
著名经济学家、地缘政治学家。从事国际政治、经济、世界新秩序分析研究愈30年。美
国普林斯顿大学政治学学士、瑞典斯德哥尔摩大学比较经济学硕士。 威廉·恩道尔先
生作为独立的经济学家和新闻调查记者先后在纽约和欧洲工作。他的研究涵盖领域极为
广泛。
个人简介
经济学家、地缘政治学家、作家。1944年出生于美国中产阶级家庭.父亲是瑞典人母亲
是挪威人，从事国际政治、经济、世界新秩序分析研究逾30年。美国普林斯顿大学政治
学学士、瑞典斯德哥尔摩大学比较经济学硕士。五岁患小儿麻痹症。夫人是德国人，无
小孩，现居德国。他曾经说：“因为我得了小儿麻痹症，我对其他人的痛苦和苦难特别
敏感，我非常敏感于别人的痛苦，还有弱小民族的痛苦。”
威廉·恩道尔先生作为独立的经济学家和新闻调查记者先后在纽约和欧洲工作。他
的研究涵盖领域极为广泛。除能源和地缘政治，还包括关贸总协定（世界贸易组织）、
世界农业问题、国际货币基金组织、第三世界债务和亚洲金融危机等。威廉·恩道尔先
生还经常应邀在地缘政治、经济、能源等国际会议上发表演讲，并定期为世界全球化中
心及许多国际出版物撰写文章，还经常为主要欧洲银行和私人基金经理提供咨询。《石
油战争》和《粮食危机》是威廉·恩道尔的两本代表作。
代表作
《石油战争》
全面阐述了构成世界霸权的基础力量，揭示了石油、美元轮动席卷全球财富的秘密，描
绘了世界地缘政治斗争的生动场景，解析了石油危机、不结盟运动、马岛战争、核不扩
散条约、德国统一等重大历史事件背后的真正原因。这是一本了解世界经济，研究国际
政治，拓展战略思维不能不读的好书。
《粮食危机》
是旅德美籍学者威廉•恩道尔继《石油战争：石油政治决定世界新秩序》之
后的又一部力作。他以地缘政治的独特视角，无与伦比的超强思辨，无可质疑的详实史
料，条分细缕，层层剖析，为我们揭示了围绕粮食正在进行的一场不为多数人所察觉的
阴谋。这是一个由少数人策划的阴谋，他们正在图谋控制全世界的粮食供给，控制世界
大多数人生存的物质基础，从而控制世界大多数人的生存状态与生存空间，让全世界的
人们成为他们猎食的对象，成为他们永远的奴隶。这是一个设计巧妙而又隐蔽的阴谋，
由三个步骤构成。首先，他们以科学的名义，开展转基因工程研究，获得大批专利，并
控制某些重点粮食品种，如大豆、水稻等大规模农作物和鸡、奶牛等重要家禽产品。其
次，他们寻找各种机会，如大面积的农业灾害（减产或疫情）、战争（如在伊拉克）、
债务危机（如在阿根廷），借助某些国际组织（国际货币基金组织、世界银行）的庇护
，以援助为名，强迫别国的农民采用由他们控制知识产权的农作物种子。最后，他们它
利用人类用于鼓励创造发明的专利制度，以保护知识产权为借口，强迫征收种子的专利
使用费。为达到目的，他们不惜采取恶劣的手段。这些手段包括，开动宣传机器，把人
类流行了几千年的耕作习惯和耕作方式，诬蔑为落后的生产方式；隐瞒转基因种子严重
的不良后果，大规模推广未经严格检验的转基因作物；发明不育种子，让农民播种的农
作物“断子绝孙”，从而不得不年复一年地向他们“买种”耕作。这是何等的阴险。
《霸权背后》
一书详细描述了美国怎样运用从秘密经济战争和人权‘武器化’所演化出来的各种方法
，来弱化和孤立他国尤其是中国。它阐述了美国运用原始的军事力量对付其唯一的战略
核对手俄罗斯的真正性质，以及西藏、缅甸和达尔富尔在美国对中国进行地缘政治遏制
战略中的作用。
《霸权背后》向英语世界的读者以及那些不愿过二手生活的人们，提供新闻背后的
真相，揭示当今世界最大也最现实的威胁：美国的新帝国主义政策，全方位统治世界的
政策，用暴力和非暴力各种手段、直接与间接各种方式维持美国主导势力在国内外的既
得利益。 | d*********t
发帖数: 4393 | 8 http://oilgeopolitics.net/Geopolitics___Eurasia/Nobel_Geopoliti
The Geopolitical Agenda behind the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize
By F. William Engdahl, October 2010
With almost flawless political timing, the Nobel Peace Prize Committee of
the Norwegian Parliament announced the giving of the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize
to Chinese critic, political activist Liu Xiaobo. The announcement came
just as US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geither was upping the pressure on the
government of China to agree to a substantial revaluation of the Yuan, a
move that would do little for the embattled dollar but cause great harm to
China’s economy. The Nobel Prize theater is part of an escalating long-term
pressure strategy of Washington against China.
The award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo was clearly no coincidence
of events. Rather it must be understood in my view as a calculated part of a
long-term strategy, not from a few members of the Norwegian Parliament, but
from the leading elite circles of the world’s hegemonic power, the United
States, to break China’s stride to become a sovereign and leading world
economic factor. From their point of view, China must be “cut down to size.”
The Nobel Peace Prize's world media theater is a calculated part of this
strategy―trying to make China “lose face” in the eyes of the rest of the
world. That is all part of an orchestrated deeper game, using “human rights
,” and a web of NGOs and organizations that Washington controls directly or
indirectly, as a weapon of Washington geopolitics.
It is not likely to succeed any more than Washington’s calculated
incitement of Tibetan riots around circles tied to the Dalai Lama in March
2008, or its covert encouragement of unrest in China’s Xinjiang Province in
July 2009, or its attempt to activate a destabilization in China’s
neighbor country, Mýanmar in 2007, the so-called Saffron Revolution.
The circles running these pin-prick operations are aware of that. What they
are doing is carefully preparing the international climate to turn the
Peoples Republic of China from a partner and "friend" into the new “enemy
image.” It's a very high risk strategy on Washington’s part. It is also
rooted in a certain desperation over the USA's geopolitical situation.
Liu Xiaobo’s funny foreign friends
There is an old English expression that bears much truth, that a man is
known by the company he keeps. I am not qualified to speak to the person of
Liu Xiaobo. I have never met the man nor have I read his works. What I find
significant however, is the company he keeps, especially Liu’s funny
foreign friends.
Liu Xiaobo was President of the Independent Chinese PEN Center until 2007
and currently holds a seat on its board according to his official biography
at the PEN International website.1 PEN is not just any random collection of
writers. It is an integral part of the Anglo-American web of human rights
and democracy advocacy NGOs and private organizations used to achieve
defined geopolitical goals of its sponsors.
PEN calls itself the “world’s oldest human rights organization,” and was
established in the 1920’s in London by two of the leading geopolitical
strategists of the British Empire at the time, G.B. Shaw and H.G. Wells. It
is supported by a network of private US and European foundations and
corporations including Bloomberg, as well as the Norwegian Ministry of
Foreign Affairs and “other donors who wish to remain anonymous.” It aims
to create something it calls a “world culture.” That smells suspiciously
like the Anglo-American theme of “Global Governance” or David Rockefeller
’s “New World Order.” PEN is part of a larger web called the
International Freedom of Expression Exchange or IFEX, an international
network, based in Canada, of some ninety NGOs with the noble-sounding aim of
defending “the right to freedom of expression,” whatever that might mean.
IFEX members include the Washington-based Freedom House, itself financed by
the US State Department, and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED).
Freedom House, created in 1941 to promote American entry into World War II,
was used during the Cold War as a vehicle for CIA-directed anti-communist
propaganda. Its recent activities have been a central role as NGO in
Washington-directed destabilizations in Tibet, Myanmar, Ukraine, Georgia,
Serbia, Kyrgyzstan and other countries apparently not pursuing policies
satisfactory to certain powerful people in the USA. Its past president was
former CIA Director James Woolsey. Freedom House chairman, Bette Bao Lord,
was also a leading figure in the International Committee for Tibet at the
time of the 2008 Tibet riots. Freedom House has worked closely with George
Soros’ Open Society Institutes and the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign
Affairs in promoting such projects as the Washington-financed 2005 Tulip
Revolution in Kyrgyzstan that brought the Washington-friendly dictator and
drug boss, Kurmanbek Bakiyev to power.2
So much for the PEN relations of Liu Xiaobo. Now we should look at why the
Nobel award was made to him.
The little-known story of Tiananmen 1989
In their announcement of the Nobel award the committee cited Liu’s role in
the 1989 Tiananmen protests as a major factor, as well as his co-authorship
of something called Charter 08 in 2008, which Time magazine called “a
manifesto calling for democratic political reform in oppressive communist
China.”3
Liu Xiaobo reportedly flew back from teaching at America’s elite Ivy League
Columbia University in spring of 1989 to play a leading role in student
protests at Beijing’s Tiananmen Square. The events of Tiananmen Square in
June 1989 are shrouded in the images of CNN for much of the world. What few
know is that Tiananmen Square in June 1989 was an early attempt of the US
intelligence to interfere in the internal affairs of the Peoples' Republic
of China and to implement what later came to be called Color Revolutions.
Similar Color Revolutions were later run by Washington in Serbia against
Milosevic, in Ukraine with the so-called Orange Revolution, Georgia’s Rose
Revolution and other geopolitical destabilizations aimed at creating
Washington-friendly regime changes.
As I describe in my book, Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in
the New World Order, the man who urged then-President George Herbert Walker
Bush to impose strong sanctions against the Beijing government for the
events of Tiananmen was US Ambassador James R. Lilley, long-time Bush friend
and CIA official. There is good reason to believe that Lilley was the case
officer running the destabilization operation. Gene Sharp of the Albert
Einstein Institution in Boston, the author of the textbook for “non-
violence as a form of warfare” as he terms it, was also in Beijing days
before the Tiananmen protests escalated. Sharp’s organization and text,
especially his book, Civilian-Based Defense: A Post Military Weapons System,
reportedly played a significant role in the Color Revolutions in Serbia,
Ukraine and Georgia as well. Perhaps just a coincidence that Sharp was in
Beijing in June 1989…perhaps not.4
And at the time of the destabilizing events of Tiananmen in 1989, a
foundation headed by George Soros, Fund for the Reform and Opening of China,
was also reportedly forced to close down after Chinese officials accused it
of working with the CIA to destabilize China during the June 1989 Tiananmen
time.5
It is useful to recall that US intelligence in just this time was active in
bringing the collapse of the Soviet Union as well. So the fact that Liu
Xiaobo decides to drop a promising academic career in New York’s elite
Columbia University to jump into the middle of events at Tiananmen in spring
1989 suggests at the very least he might have been encouraged to do so by
some of his funny foreign friends in the US.
In terms of Liu’s role in drafting the Charter 08, his timing here is also
remarkable and curious. At a time when China is modernizing its economy and
allowing what appear to this writer as in many cases more individual freedom
than one finds in certain Western so-called democracies, Liu escalates
political pressures on the Beijing government. And he does it in 2008,
clearly knowing well that Chinese officials are extremely sensitive to
possible efforts by Tibet and other groups such as Uighurs to embarrass
Beijing during the Olympics. The US State Department admitted that the 2008
Tibet Dalai Lama-supported protests and riots were the most serious internal
unrest in the history of the Peoples’ Republic. It was hardly a time to
demand more opening of dissent if one were really serious about such themes.
It suggests that the activities of Liu Xiaobo might have another deeper
agenda which perhaps his funny foreign friends provide.
The Nobel Prize Nomination
In this context, the list of names who formally nominated Liu Xiaobo to get
the Nobel Peace Prize in 2010 is worth noting. The nomination was proposed
by none other than the Dalai Lama, a long-time recipient of US Government
financial largesse, from both the CIA and the US Congress v ia the National
Endowment for Democracy. The fact that the Dalai Lama nominated Liu says
much of the geopolitical nature of this year’s Nobel Peace Prize.
If we then look at a list of the other persons who nominated Liu Xiaobo, it
reads like an international membership list of David Rockefeller’s very
secretive Trilateral Commission, an ultra-elite membership-by-invitation-
only group of three hundred of the most powerful persons in North America,
Europe and Japan (China has not been invited to this select club).
Along with Dalai Lama, Karel Prince of Schwarzenberg and Czech Foreign
Minister, former WTO head Mike Moore, Russian free market opposition
politician Grigory A. Yavlinsky, all nominated Liu.
Prince Karel, Moore and Yavlinsky are all members of the elite Trilateral
Commission suggesting that might be where plans were made to make Liu Xiaobo
the Nobel winner.
Pro-NATO former Czech President Vaclav Havel, who is chairman of the
International Council of the George Soros-financed Human Rights Watch, also
joined in nominating Liu for the prize. Havel, who is close friends with
Prince Karel, notes that Liu’s Charter 08 was modeled on Havel’s Czech
Charter 77 which was used, with covert US backing, to destabilize the Soviet
Union in the 1980's.6 It all suggests a close-knit club as Havel, and the
club dues are paid by Washington in this case.
About the Nobel Committee of the Norwegian Parliament little is made public.
Their website stresses their complete independence which is less than
credible if one looks to the list of names they have awarded the prize to.
It includes the Dalai Lama, Burmese jailed opposition leader Aung San Suu
Kyi, Barack Obama who got the award after only two weeks in office and
despite the fact his military buildup of the war in Afghanistan was explicit
before his nomination, Henry Kissinger who as Secretary of State backed
repressive death squad regimes of Latin American dictators during the 1970's
. And of course, just when Wall Street banks and Anglo-American
establishment decides to promote the fraud of global warming, the Nobel
Peace Prize is awarded to the discredited UN IPCC and to global warming
promoter Al Gore. To put the facts in the open, evidence is clear that the
Nobel Peace Prize is part of the geopolitical instruments of the NATO
circles used to put pressure on governments it does not completely approve
of. Norway is a founding member of NATO and has extremely close ties to
leading US circles.
The Deeper Geopolitical Significance
The question as to why US powerful circles chose this moment to escalate
pressure on the Peoples' Republic of China by awarding the Peace Prize to
Liu Xaiobo is evident from the recent emergence of China as a strong and
dynamically-growing world economy at the same time that the United States
sinks into the worst economic depression in more than two hundred years of
its existence.
Official US strategic policy remains that elaborated in the September 2002
National Security Strategy of the United States, sometimes termed the Bush
Doctrine which states that "America's political and military mission in the
post-cold-war era will be to ensure that no rival superpower is allowed to
emerge in Western Europe, Asia or the territories of the former Soviet Union
." That formulation has been explicit Pentagon doctrine since 1992.7
The reason China is being targeted? Simply because China today exists, and
exists as a dynamically emerging world factor in economics and politics,
creating foreign alliances to support that growth in places like Sudan or
Iran where Washington has less control. At his point China's existence as a
dynamic stable nation is a growing strategic threat to the United States,
not because China threatens war as Washington is doing all round the world.
The threat is that the United States and those who dominate its policy lose
that global hegemonic position as China, Russia, the Shanghai Cooperation
Organization countries of Central Asia as well as countless other countries
move toward a far more diverse multi-polar world. According to the Bush
Doctrine and US strategic geopolitics, that further dynamic must be
prevented at all costs now while it is still possible. The recent escalation
of sanctions against Iran by the UN Security Council under strong US
pressure had less to do with Iran and its nuclear ambitions than with the
fact that Iran is a strategic economic partner of China.
The award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo, far from a gesture in
promotion of peace ought better to be seen for what it is: a US-guided, NGO-
fostered part of a declaration of irregular warfare against the sovereign
existence of China. British Balance of Power geopolitics since two hundred
or more years has had as axiom that the hegemonic empire must always seek
out the weaker of two potential adversaries and ally with it to destroy the
stronger. US policy with regard to India since 2001 and with regard to China
since 2008 has been just that, pursuit of a military and strategic alliance
with the vastly weaker but useful India against strategic Chinese interests
in Asia especially Pakistan and Afghanistan.
The official presence of NATO in Afghanistan, far away from the North
Atlantic area of NATO ought to signal that all this is not about promotion
of democracy or freedom of expression, but about a declining hegemon
desperately trying every weapon in its arsenal to reverse reality. Liu
Xaiobo is but a convenient tool in their efforts, one of countless many,
like the Dalai Lama or Rebiya Kadeer of the Washington-backed World Uyghur
Congress. They seem to have less effect as American credibility declines
along with its economic stability, a highly unstable mix.
1 PEN America Center Website, China: Liu Xiaobo, accessed here
2 Philip Shishkin, In Putin's Backyard, Democracy Stirs -- With US Help, The
Wall Street Journal, February 25, 2005
3 The Nobel Peace Prize Committee, The Nobel Peace Prize 2010: Liu Xiaobo,
accessed here. For the Time quote, see
4 F. William Engdahl, Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the
New World Order, Wiesbaden,
edition.engdahl, 2009, pp. 43, 117. As well, for more on the methods of
Sharp and the RAND Corporation, Jonathan Mowat, The new Gladio in action?,
Online Journal, March 19, 2005, accessed here
5 United Press International (UPI), China Fund employee reportedly
interrogated, August 9, 1989.
6 Vaclav Havel et al, A Chinese Champion of Peace and Freedom, January 18,
2010, accessed here
7 Patrick E. Tyler, U.S. Strategy Plan Calls for Insuring No Rivals Develop:
A One-Superpower World, The New York Times, March 8, 1992. | w*****9
发帖数: 365 | 9
【在 w*********g 的大作中提到】
: 刘晓波背后那些可笑的外国朋友
: 2010年诺贝尔和平奖背后是地缘政治议程
: 威廉·恩道尔[1]
: 著作：《霸权背后》、《金融海啸》、《石油战争》、《粮食危机》
: 在一个极其微妙而敏感的时刻，挪威议会诺贝尔和平奖委员会把2010年诺贝尔和平奖授
: 予了中国的刘晓波。此时此刻，美国财政部长蒂莫西·盖特纳正在向中国政府施压，试
: 图迫使人民币大幅升值——其实这对于深陷困境的美元毫无帮助，但是对中国的经济却
: 会造成危害。诺贝尔和平奖成了上演闹剧的舞台，这里演出的是华盛顿反对中国的战略
: 大戏——不断升级、长期施压的战略行动。
: 把诺贝尔今年度和平奖发给刘晓波，显然不是什么巧合。准确地说，这是一项精心安排
|
|
