由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - Preparing The Narrative of Defeat
相关主题
Here is Why Liberals Think Politics is so Bad TodayHow the Dual Income Destroys the Lower Classes
Maddow V5:找到输得理由了,都是天气惹的祸one piece of experience to educate leftist
Look who’s taking bucketfuls of Wall Street CashTrump赢了,政治不正确NYU教授没事了
No, Left-Wingers, the ‘Founders’ Did NOT Approve of Mandates or ObamacareThe Real Reason They Hate Trump
几个大选结果We Wouldn't Want to 'Overly Parse' Bill Clinton, Now Would We
仔细看下:三的字提出的政策和希特勒的政策差不多New WH Chief of Staff a Low-Key, Long-Time Insider
这篇文章里指出了Ford故事里漏洞Desperate Ambush Attempt by Obama Fails in New York
Jamie Glazov:为什么左派为本-拉登的死亡哭泣除了民调外,还有两个比较靠谱的总统选举预测。。。
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: court话题: obamacare话题: supreme话题: let话题: obama
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
April 2, 2012 Posted by Rodney Graves
Having failed (miserably) to read and understand the arguments of the
Conservatives when it came to the challenges to Obamacare, the Democrats and
the LSM (but I repeat myself) were shocked to find that the high court did
indeed appear receptive to those arguments, and dismissive of their own
positions.
Now they are working on “Plan B.”
So far that plan appears to be claiming that a ruling against Obamacare
would be a political, vice a judicial, decision and that it would mark an
activist court…
Let It Be (Political)
Obamacare, politics, and the modern Supreme Court.
By Ross Kaminsky | The American Spectator -Special Report-
And in my hour of darkness
She is standing right in front of me
Speaking words of wisdom, let it be
Democratic political strategist and organizer Robert Creamer claims that
overturning Obamacare would make the Supreme Court the “most activist [and
] partisan in modern history.”
Radical leftist MSNBC host Rachel Maddow says that the Obamacare
decision “may as much be a referendum on the Supreme Court and whether or
not the Roberts court is so conservatively politicized that it will make a
decision to hurt the President, rather than sticking closely to precedent
here.”
In short, supporters of President Obama and his de facto nationalization
of the health insurance industry are setting the table to blame the
impending destruction of Obamacare, or at least its core “individual
mandate” provision, on politics.
The Court’s decision may indeed be political, but not in the way the
left suggests.
The most reasonable claim of Court partisanship is against Elena Kagan
who should have recused herself from this case due for involvement in the
Obama administration’s legal defense strategy for the law, and for her e-
mailed glee at the law’s passage. In any case, the idea that conservative
judges appointed by prior presidents would rule based on partisan politics
is liberal paranoia.
But if Democrats want to say the decision is partisan politics, I say —
quoting another famous leftist — Let It Be.
Let the constitution at long last return to speaking words of wisdom to
the “broken hearted people” of America suffering under the Obama regime’s
many petty tyrannies.
Indeed, and read the whole thing…
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
除了民调外,还有两个比较靠谱的总统选举预测。。。几个大选结果
Desperate Democrat: Don’t Use Obama’s IRS Scandal to Score Political Points or Somet仔细看下:三的字提出的政策和希特勒的政策差不多
Ugliest Man in America Leaving Congress这篇文章里指出了Ford故事里漏洞
Senate passes Keystone XL measureJamie Glazov:为什么左派为本-拉登的死亡哭泣
Here is Why Liberals Think Politics is so Bad TodayHow the Dual Income Destroys the Lower Classes
Maddow V5:找到输得理由了,都是天气惹的祸one piece of experience to educate leftist
Look who’s taking bucketfuls of Wall Street CashTrump赢了,政治不正确NYU教授没事了
No, Left-Wingers, the ‘Founders’ Did NOT Approve of Mandates or ObamacareThe Real Reason They Hate Trump
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: court话题: obamacare话题: supreme话题: let话题: obama