B*****l
发帖数: 192 | 1 还有一段很费解：
The petitioner may demonstrate the beneficiary is internationally recognized
by showing his work has been cited by others. The petitioner has included
citatoin records in the submitted evidence. However, the evidence does not
demonstrate how these citations establish the significance or value of the
published material nor has the petitioner shown how this material has gained
the beneficiary international recognition and how it sets him apart from
peers.
这个怎么答复？谢谢高手指教！ |
|
b*******1
发帖数: 127 | 2 This is the key! Read every paper that cite your paper, and extract
important quotes praising your work and add these into your cover letter!
How can you miss such an important step? The most important part if the
quality not the quantity of citations. The reason IO gave you this comments
is to give you the 2nd chance to prove that you are internationally
recognized from those praise in the international papers. Read old posts and
good luck!
The petitioner may demonstrate the beneficiary is inte... 阅读全帖 |
|
q***a
发帖数: 3877 | 3 除了职业类移民(Employment-Based)外，家庭类移民（Family-Based）也是移民美国的
一个主要途径。据统计，每年拿绿卡的新移民中，相当多的一部分是通过家庭类移民方
式拿到绿卡的。职业移民第一步通常是从递交I-140 petition开始（PERM例外，是从LCA开
始)，家庭类移民通常是从递交I-130 petition开始。
在美国，凡是以I打头的表格，都是跟美国移民局（USCIS）相关的，一般是递到USCIS
；凡是以DS打头的表格，都是跟美国国务院（Department of State）相关的，一般是
递到DOS、NVC（National Visa Center,DOS的一个下属机构）或者美国驻海外领事馆（
DOS的外派机构)。
I-130就是递到USCIS的一类申请，其目的是为自己的亲人申请移民美国的移民签证。本文就来说说
I-130的具体填写方法和注意事项。
I-130表格填写其实并不复杂，总共就两页。第一页最上方有一个大框，写着“DO NOT WRITE IN THIS BLOCK-FOR USCIS OFFICE ONLY”。作为申请人本人，不用管... 阅读全帖 |
|
q***a
发帖数: 3877 | 4 除了职业类移民(Employment-Based)外，家庭类移民（Family-Based）也是移民美国的
一个主要途径。据统计，每年拿绿卡的新移民中，相当多的一部分是通过家庭类移民方
式拿到绿卡的。职业移民第一步通常是从递交I-140 petition开始（PERM例外，是从LCA开
始)，家庭类移民通常是从递交I-130 petition开始。
在美国，凡是以I打头的表格，都是跟美国移民局（USCIS）相关的，一般是递到USCIS
；凡是以DS打头的表格，都是跟美国国务院（Department of State）相关的，一般是
递到DOS、NVC（National Visa Center,DOS的一个下属机构）或者美国驻海外领事馆（
DOS的外派机构)。
I-130就是递到USCIS的一类申请，其目的是为自己的亲人申请移民美国的移民签证。本文就来说说I-130的具体填写方法和注意事项。
I-130表格填写其实并不复杂，总共就两页。第一页最上方有一个大框，写着“DO NOT WRITE IN THIS BLOCK-FOR USCIS OFFICE ONLY”。作为申请人本人，不用管这... 阅读全帖 |
|
i*****a
发帖数: 572 | 5 我老婆是美国公民，我是中国公民，她现在给我申请绿卡。她submit的是I130，我
submit的是
I485。现在移民局要我补材料，信中这么说：
submit a completed and signed Form I-864 Affidavit of Support for the
petitioner/sponsor listed on Form I-130 or Form I-129F. Even if a joint
sponsor will be used the petitioner/sponsor must submit Form I-864. (The
Form I-134 is not acceptable to use for Adjustment of Status.) Also,
provide copies of the petitioner/sponsor's most recent Federal Income tax
returns.
这I-864就是所谓的经济担保书，由于我老婆刚毕业不久，2010年报税还不够多，不能
为我提供经济担
保。但是她201... 阅读全帖 |
|
q***a
发帖数: 3877 | 6 我老婆是美国公民，我是中国公民，她现在给我申请绿卡。她submit的是I130，我
submit的是I485。现在移民局要我补材料，信中这么说：
submit a completed and signed Form I-864 Affidavit of Support for the
petitioner/sponsor listed on Form I-130 or Form I-129F. Even if a joint
sponsor will be used the petitioner/sponsor must submit Form I-864. (The
Form I-134 is not acceptable to use for Adjustment of Status.) Also,
provide copies of the petitioner/sponsor's most recent Federal Income tax
returns.
这I-864就是所谓的经济担保书，由于我老婆刚毕业不久，2010年报税还不够多，不能
为我提供经济担保。但是她2011年... 阅读全帖 |
|
c**2
发帖数: 8496 | 7 DIY or not is not the point.
you can sign as petitioner if I140 type is EB1A. (NIW is not eligible for PP)
You cannot sign as petitioner if EB1B or PERM based , because you are not
the petitioner. |
|
z********m
发帖数: 21 | 8 EB-1b 申请（加急PP）遇到RFE，USCIS需要公司（Petitioner）的以下材料：
1. Petitioner's 2009 tax returns and 2009 W-2's for each employee.
2. Additional evidence to establish when each employee began working for the
petitioner and whether they are full-time or part-time employees.
3. A company flowchart identifying each employee by name, occupation, data
of hire, and salary.
4. A brief description of each employee's duties and daily responsibilities.
由于是一个20人的小公司，没有过帮助员工申请绿卡的经验，更没有回复RFE的经验。
请问大家有没有遇到类似的RFE？可不可以提供一个回答此类... 阅读全帖 |
|
G*********s
发帖数: 6786 | 9 不知道啊，所以上来问问，以前有过这种情况么？
我的号周围大约有30%左右的transfer。大概如下
Initial Review
On February 3, 2011, we transferred this case I140 IMMIGRANT PETITION
FOR ALIEN WORKER to our LINCOLN, NE location for processing and sent you
a notice explaining this action. Please follow any instructions provided
on the notice. We will notify you by mail when a decision is made. If
you move while this case is pending, please use our Change of Address
online tool to update your case with your new address or call our
customer ser... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*******t
发帖数: 532 | 10 You sould look at the first link for criteria.
简单地说, 要有证据：
1. 符合三条.
2. “sustained" national or international acclaim,
3. You are in very small percent Top.
2.&3. are based on the quality of 1.
Part One Note: Objectively meeting the regulatory criteria in part one alone
does not establish that the alien in fact meets the requirements for
classification as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability under section 203(b)(1)(
A) of the INA.
For example:
Participating in the judging of the work of others in th... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
w******f
发帖数: 620 | 12 PD 2007 April EB2
I just check the online status, I did find the following words, is that word
general for all the case or just apply for my case?
During this step, USCIS initiates the background checks of the applicant/
petitioner and identifies issues that may need to be addressed either during
an interview or by asking the applicant/petitioner to submit additional
information or documentation. USCIS reviews the applicant's/petitioner's
criminal history, determines if there are national securi... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*****y
发帖数: 205 | 13 这个应该比较容易，找合作作者写信证明你的integral贡献就好了，
如有必要引用一下AAO 2010年1月份第二个判例中原话
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B2%20-
%20Aliens%20with%20Extraordinary%20Ability/Decisions_Issued_in_2010/Jan0
42010_01B2203.pdf
第五页
"As modern scientific research endeavors routinely involve collaborative
efforts, we
find no statutory, regulatory, precedential, or evidentiary basis to
conclude that USCIS should not
assign weight to collaborative scientific research such as the
petitioner's. It could be argued that the
director was simp... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*********y
发帖数: 127 | 14 第一，part II, You are: 下面有两个选择，一个是applicant, 一个是petitioner,选
哪个
啊？
第二，907的instruction里面说，petitioner, attorney, or beneficiary can pay
the $1,225 fee but the petitioner cannot sign Form I-907是啥意思呢？我自己给自
己petition的不能sign吗？
多谢 |
|
e***c
发帖数: 68 | 15 Got a meaning less LUD this morning at 9AM
*** DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL ***
The last processing action taken on your case
Receipt Number: SRC11102＃＃＃＃＃
Application Type: I485 , APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO
ADJUST STATUS
Your Case Status: Initial Review
The I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS was
transferred and is now being processed at a USCIS office. You will be
notified by mail when a decision is made, or if the office needs something... 阅读全帖 |
|
o**y
发帖数: 1466 | 16 攒rp,如果觉得有用的话请顶一下。下面写的有些是老生常谈的东西，谈不上什么”
original",但是我自己总结的。
总的一句话，在准备任何东西的时候，一定要把"international recognition"记在心
头，写PL和推荐信的时候一定要把过去时，过去完成时，现在完成时记在心头，暂时彻
底地忘记将来时，虚拟语气词。
1. PL 和推荐信里一定要完全避免这样的字：may, will, can be, and so on. 一定要
用”has", "have", "did", "already".
2. 是original research contribution, not "original research", 关键词是"
contribution", “original research"只是个定语。Original research vs.
research contribution，所以要强调“contribution"
3. 要contribution to the field of academy,而不是一个project or an
institution。... 阅读全帖 |
|
k*********y
发帖数: 17 | 17 第一项内容里面问的employer,在最后一步出来的PDF里居然是petitioner.
NIW是self petition, petitioner 应该是self.
但是这个表里面petitioner是我的公司。
我是不是填错了，废了？求解答，谢谢！！！ |
|
b*********r
发帖数: 15 | 18 The petitioner claims to have satisfied this criterion by virtue of his
membership in) Sigma Xi.
According to the bylaws the petitioner submitted as evidence
for the American Vacuum Society, the society does not require demonstrative
outstanding achievement as a
prerequisite for membership. Sigma Xi is a scientific research society.
According to the Sigma Xi web site,
“Membership in Sigma Xi is by nomination and is conferred in one of two
ways. Full Membership is
conferred upon any individual wh... 阅读全帖 |
|
T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 19 I-140, the first step in green card application to get the immigration
visa quota. This is the most critical step.
I-485, the adjustment of status to get the green card finally.
I-907, premium processing to speed up the I-140 processing to be within
15 days, which applies to RFE response, if any. It is the same form for
H1B expedition, as well.
I-765, EAD (for employment authorization), free with I-485 application,
or while 485-pending.
I-131, AP (advanced parole), the travel document to enable ... 阅读全帖 |
|
M**I
发帖数: 491 | 20 claimed 3, met 2
"The beneficiary has met at least two criteria.
However, in each case, the totality of the evidence must establish that the
beneficiary is:
- Recognized internationally as outstanding in the academic field specified
in the petition.
A review of the record does not establish that this has been met.
The record includes evidence of the beneficiary serving as a peer reviewer.
However, peer review is an inherent part of the job of a researcher. Without
evidence that the beneficiary h... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*******2
发帖数: 656 | 21 USCIS在10/3发出的通知，10/7我收到了RFE的邮件（EB1A和NIW）。我的律师应该也有
一份邮件copy。
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/32075977.html
EB1A的RFE复杂一些，先讨论一下这个NIW吧。
NIW的RFE俩页，大致说的俩问题吧：
1) the petitioner mush establish that the beneficiary has a past record of
specific prior achievement with some degree of influence on the field as a
whole. please submit evidence to establish that "the beneficiary's past
record" justifies projections of future benefit to the nation.
2) .. while the evidence shows the respect of the ... 阅读全帖 |
|
d********e
发帖数: 198 | 22 我自己DIY的，刚刚把材料寄出去了，选了第一个，但我觉得我搞错了；petitioner 和 applicant 的区别是，petitioner 是替别人申请，而 applicant 是给自己申请 http://abroad123.blogspot.com/2008/12/i-907.html
那个907form introduction里面没有这方面的解释，我填之前留心了一下petitioner
和 applicant的差别，但还是搞错了。
大家觉得这个错误严重吗？
PP.
for |
|
m*******e
发帖数: 99 | 23 9月23日 priority date
10月18日 收到RFE的来信
我的背景介绍：07年4月来美做BME的postdoc，此前的专业是ME. 今年7月从postdoc升
到了research assistant scientist，然后开始DIY申请绿卡（NIW）.国内在ME领域发
了10篇paper，有一些奖励（包括两个national的），引用大约40次（他引31次左右）
；来美后，在BME领域发了9篇paper，无奖励，引用只有17次（他引只有6次），另有3
篇会议的paper.
我提交了6封推荐信，包括国内博士的老板，现在的老板，国内的一位教授，新加坡的
一位助理教授，美国的一位副教授，和一位州议员。
RFE的信件有一页多一点，其中说道：
While the beneficiary's work has clearly impressed some experts in the field
of biomedical engineering, the record does not demonstrate that the
petitioner has establishe... 阅读全帖 |
|
g*******3
发帖数: 2520 | 24 我最能想到的凤姐可能被RFE的地方是第2条： 奇丑无比。
The RFE letter is like this:
the petitioner provided a report based on her anatomic analysis carried out
by a US doctor certified on board indicates that she meets the criteria of
being a female.
However, the petitioner claimed herself as being ugly, while most Chinese
regard her looking as repulsive, the opinion itself could not establish that
the petitioner is an international recognized ugly woman. For example, most
American people love this Asian looking and deem... 阅读全帖 |
|
m**********3
发帖数: 706 | 25 胡乱差了我前面几个人的485，看到了这个。是不是说这个人有问题啊。看来大家的
CASE是initial review也比他的好啊。
On November 2, 2011, we transferred this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER
PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS to another office for processing
because they now have jurisdiction over the case. We sent you a notice of
this transfer. Please follow any instructions on this notice. You will be
notified by mail when a decision is made, or if the office needs something
from you. If you move while this case is pending, please use our Cha... 阅读全帖 |
|
o*******u
发帖数: 242 | 26 A. Award
1.1 奖学金
• “academic scholarships and student awards cannot be considered
prizes or awards in the beneficiary's field of endeavor. Moreover,
competition for scholarships is limited to other students. Experienced
experts in the field are not seeking scholarships. Similarly,
experienced
experts do not compete for fellowships and competitive postdoctoral
appointments. Thus, they do not suggest that a beneficiary is
internationally recognized.”
• A postdoctoral appointme... 阅读全帖 |
|
o*******u
发帖数: 242 | 27 有关工作性质与雇主
1. 永久工作
• having no fixed term and in which the employee will ordinarily
have an expectation of permanent employment" are comparable positions.
• potential for continued funding is irrelevant
• Thus, a letter addressed to U. S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS) afirming the beneficiary's employment is not a job offer
within the ordinary meaning of that phrase.
•有关adjunct professor: On November 10, 2008, this office advised
the petitione... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*******l
发帖数: 2495 | 28 There is no need to pp PERM 140. This year's EB2-PERM for this year's PD is not current,
and I guess it won't be current very soon.
When considering perm processing time, getting the prevailing wage, post the
ad, interview the candidates should also take into considerations (It took
one of my friends 2-3 years for that process before PERM submission because
of the delay of HR and also they have to redo the ad and interview part
because of some qualified candidates who applied for the job).
When... 阅读全帖 |
|
e********t
发帖数: 1865 | 29 你说的是对的，但是PP140是为了万一公司裁员140没批就前功尽弃了，140批了好歹PD
能保留。就雇主自由这个角度看，NIW是比perm强，不用重复办。
is not current,
the
took
because
is the time NIW is submitted. So the processing time for PERM or NIW 140
will not affect PD (if both cases are approved).Generally speaking, if the
petitioner works very hard to get the NIW 140 done, the PD for NIW will be
earlier than the PD for PERM, and submission time can be controlled by the
petitioner.
is approved. Even the 140 is still pending for NIW, if the PD is current,
the ... 阅读全帖 |
|
l******c
发帖数: 8 | 30 I-140和RFE回复均为自己准备（DIY），最终收到Deny。
准备提交I-290B申请Motion to Reopen。查阅USCIS网站，却没搞明白是否可以自己提
交申请。
USCIS网站信息如下：
Q. I am the beneficiary of a visa petition. Can I file an appeal or motion?
A. Only the visa petitioner can file an appeal or motion in a visa petition
case. Thus, if you are the beneficiary, you cannot file an appeal or motion
, unless you are both the petitioner and the beneficiary （申请人和受益人为
同一人情况下可以？）(for example, you are a VAWA self-petitioner, the widow(
er) of a citizen, or otherwise a... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*******8
发帖数: 260 | 31 IO said in the very beginning of the ref "The record indicates that the
petitioner has published seven journal articles."......
Close to the end of the ref IO said "The petitioner must establish that the
beneficiary has a past record of specific achievement with come degree of
influence on the field as a whole...the beneficiary's capability to serve
the national interest to a substantial greater extent... For example, the
petitioner may submit copies of patents and copyright, grant proposals, p... 阅读全帖 |
|
b**o
发帖数: 5769 | 32 找到一篇如何填写I-130的，以前从网上找来的，不记得出处了。
除了职业类移民(Employment-Based)外，家庭类移民（Family-Based）也是移民美国的
一个主要途径。据统计，每年拿绿卡的新移民中，相当多的一部分是通过家庭类移民方
式拿到绿卡的。职业移民第一步通常是从递交I-140 petition开始（PERM例外，是从
LCA开
始)，家庭类移民通常是从递交I-130 petition开始。
在美国，凡是以I打头的表格，都是跟美国移民局（USCIS）相关的，一般是递到USCIS
；凡是以DS打头的表格，都是跟美国国务院（Department of State）相关的，一般是
递到DOS、NVC（National Visa Center,DOS的一个下属机构）或者美国驻海外领事馆（
DOS的外派机构)。
I-130就是递到USCIS的一类申请，其目的是为自己的亲人申请移民美国的移民签证。本
文就来说说I-130的具体填写方法和注意事项。
I-130表格填写其实并不复杂，总共就两页。第一页最上方有一个大框，写着“DO NOT
WRITE IN THIS BLOCK-F... 阅读全帖 |
|
b**o
发帖数: 5769 | 33 找到一篇如何填写I-130的，以前从网上找来的，不记得出处了。
除了职业类移民(Employment-Based)外，家庭类移民（Family-Based）也是移民美国的
一个主要途径。据统计，每年拿绿卡的新移民中，相当多的一部分是通过家庭类移民方
式拿到绿卡的。职业移民第一步通常是从递交I-140 petition开始（PERM例外，是从
LCA开
始)，家庭类移民通常是从递交I-130 petition开始。
在美国，凡是以I打头的表格，都是跟美国移民局（USCIS）相关的，一般是递到USCIS
；凡是以DS打头的表格，都是跟美国国务院（Department of State）相关的，一般是
递到DOS、NVC（National Visa Center,DOS的一个下属机构）或者美国驻海外领事馆（
DOS的外派机构)。
I-130就是递到USCIS的一类申请，其目的是为自己的亲人申请移民美国的移民签证。本
文就来说说I-130的具体填写方法和注意事项。
I-130表格填写其实并不复杂，总共就两页。第一页最上方有一个大框，写着“DO NOT
WRITE IN THIS BLOCK-F... 阅读全帖 |
|
m********y
发帖数: 33 | 34 穷人一个，没有包子，首先对各位XDJM的热情帮助表示衷心感谢！！！
背景：生物， 国内PhD，副教授，作为PI曾有4个grant(1个国家基金1个部级基金2项市
级人才奖励性质项目），2个国家级横向合作项目负责人，得过一些市级奖励，有14个
国内专利(1项授权，其他pending），28篇论文，一作14篇，4篇通讯作者，7篇英文论
文（impact factor 2-4分），在美国的研究暂时还没有相关paper；citation 不到60
而且都没有牛杂志引用；给国内某专业杂志连续审稿10年。现在美Top 5的名校任RA。
claim 3项：contribution，authorship和judge，有律师，认为case不strong，所以没
有pp，苦等了6个月，结果收到RFE。承认authorship和judge，但是认为contribution
证据不
足，另要求补充employer letter和contract等，原文大致如下：
The petitioner asserts that has played a key role as an independent
princi... 阅读全帖 |
|
w*********i
发帖数: 670 | 35 我们公司律师把人家引用算到这一条了。我当时感觉就不大对。今天我看了一下精诚律
师里面对此有个说明。我感觉那我的公司律师理解完全不对？有人碰到过这个问题吗？
Published material in professional publications written by others about the
person's work in the academic field。
There seems to be widespread misunderstanding of a number of nuances of this
criterion. Many petitioners presented evidence of citations to the
petitioner's works as evidence of published material about the petitioner.
However, the AAO has repeatedly stated that citations do not satisfy this
requirement. |
|
a******n
发帖数: 5925 | 36 再看了一下， case 状态是initial review, 但是又说邮局退信。会不会退信那一条是
错误？
Initial Review
On March 26, 2012, the post office returned the notice we last sent you on
this case I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST
STATUS as undeliverable. This may have serious effects on processing this
case. Please call 1-800-375-5283 to update your mailing address for this
notice to be re-sent.
During this step, USCIS initiates the background checks of the applicant/
petitioner and identifies issues that may... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*******e
发帖数: 24532 | 37 Starting from May, it seems that USCIS adds a new status update for mailing
out finger print notice, which was not shown before. The sample is like
below:
Initial Review
On May 2, 2012, we mailed a Biometrics Appointment Notice to you, indicating
date, time, and place for your appointment. Please follow instructions on
the notice for any required identification and documentation for the
appointment. If you have not received the notice within 30 days of the date
above, please call customer servic... 阅读全帖 |
|
b******i
发帖数: 44 | 38 刚收到下面的EMAIL通知，它的意思是说我的CASE还没有进行BACKGROUND CHECK码？
或还可能需要面谈？这新的OFFICE是什么OFFICE。。 有知道的人解释下吗？
On May 21, 2012, we transferred this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT
RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS to another office for processing because they
now have jurisdiction over the case. We sent you a notice of this transfer.
Please follow any instructions on this notice. You will be notified by mail
when a decision is made, or if the office needs something from you. If you
move while this case is pendin... 阅读全帖 |
|
j**l
发帖数: 2911 | 39 我觉得原文里的petitioner 用 petitioner's name and the
term "retina," 来search 文章，这个search 出来的结果很大可能并不是
这个petitioner， 我觉得io question 的也是这个。 |
|
S*******e
发帖数: 1749 | 40 Your Case Status: Initial Review
On July 2, 2012, we transferred this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT
RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS to another office for processing because they
now have jurisdiction over the case. We sent you a notice of this transfer.
Please follow any instructions on this notice. You will be notified by mail
when a decision is made, or if the office needs something from you. If you
move while this case is pending, please use our Change of Address online
tool to update ... 阅读全帖 |
|
i******s
发帖数: 925 | 41 今天忽然收到NOID的信件，网上状态还是initial review。这是2进攻了，请了版上著
名的律师。
是tsc xm 0106.给了33天， 信件是26号寄出的，今天才收到，10天过去了。请xdjm给
点注意。谢谢！
claim 了老三样，承认了符合三项。但small percentage没有达到。
1. 提出我审稿的一个中文杂志不enjoys a distinguished international reputation
. Thus the bneficiary's editorial position of this journal is questionable.
我知道我的审稿是弱项，总数虽多（60+提交时），但多数是垃圾杂志，还有中文凑数
的。感觉死定了。有好的建议吗？谢谢先。
2. 我10篇文章，他拿推荐人发了100或50多篇跟我比。‘uscis cannot conclude that
the beneficiary's publication record is consistent with sustained national
or internation... 阅读全帖 |
|
i******s
发帖数: 925 | 42 这是完整的NOID， 请大家给点主意，还有就没？律师在催着要钱呢。
USCIS has determined that the petitioner has provided sufficient
documentation to establish the beneficiary has met the following regulatory
criteria:
.judge
.contribution
.authorship
As the petitioner has submitted evidence to demonstrate the beneficiary has
met at least 3 of the 10 regulatory criteria, USCIS must now examine the
evidence presented in its entirety to make an initial final merits
determination of whether or not the petitioner, by a preponderance... 阅读全帖 |
|
g*****n
发帖数: 216 | 43 这个跟自己的文章没有关系吧？
这段第一句说 The evidence indecates the petitioner has conducted peer
reviews. blabla
然后说peer review是routine activity. Therefore, peer-review is not, by
itself, indicative of, or consistent with being in the very top of a field
or sustained national or international acclaim
最后一句说Without evidence that sets the petitioner apart from others in the
field it cannot be concluded that this evidence reflects the petitioner is
in the very top of the field or has sustained national or internation... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*********8
发帖数: 116 | 44 DIY的材料准备，基本上都是在版上学到的。 现在我也把我的RFE的response letter分
享下。RFE的response其实也就是再重新组织材料，重新写的petition letter.
看到RFE， 我感觉IO根本没怎么看我的petition letter, 所以在准备response的时候
，都时时考虑，如果IO粗略扫一眼的话，他能不能get the point. 所以用了很多下划
线，加粗之类的highlight 关键词。格式上每一项，每一小项都分清楚。那些个比较复
杂的证据，如果不是非常强，宁可不要。
背景见http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/32481591.html
Dear Sir or Madam:
Thank you for considering my immigrant petition as individuals with
extraordinary ability (EB-1A). I appreciate the opportunity to address
questions and pr... 阅读全帖 |
|
c****l
发帖数: 1086 | 45 本人情况特殊，先申了eb1-b，5月份就批了。因为要离开现在单位，所以又硬上了eb1-
a，刚刚收到email，eb1-a也approved。
TSC
Filed on June 20
PP RD on June 21
RFE on June 29 by xm 1056
RFE response RD on July 10
approved on July 18
晚上6点多收到的email
背景：
biomedical PhD from US
Publications: 11, only 4 1st Author papers, 引用多的文章都是国内挂名的文章，
4篇conference abstracts
Citation: 160+ with Google S, independent
citation：110+, 其中两篇文章有杂志的专门的highlight reviews。
Review: 11 for 5 journals
RL: 6， 4 from independent scientists。其中一封是rfe后加的。
PL: claimed review, contr... 阅读全帖 |
|
m*****e
发帖数: 85 | 46 首先祝大家好运! 在版上看了好久, 很喜欢版上大家互相帮助打气的气氛, 现在也恳求
大家多出主意帮我打败RFE.
1. 申请时间表:
140 RD: 06/15/2012
PP RD: 07/06/2012
RFE ND: 07/16/2012
IO: 0450, 也是个director
------------------------------------------------------
2. 个人背景:
专业: 化学, 美国top学校博士和博士后(很鸡肋, 申绿卡好像一点用处也没有)
文章: 15 英文, 6一作; 1 ACS年会报告.
引用: 总的220+, 独立160+, 有一些文章大段地引用了我的工作; 独立引用递了申请后
又涨了点, 但是不多, 只有接近10个.
推荐信: 4us+1canada+1australia, 3独立的. 准备推荐信时还不流行不要找大牛, 所
以推荐人基本上都是大牛, 还有一个诺奖得主, 还好没有被悲剧地跟推荐人比.
审稿: 40+, 杂志有8个, 水平都还可以; 递了申请后又多了5个审稿和一个杂志.
--------------------... 阅读全帖 |
|
J*******0
发帖数: 108 | 47 收到NIW RFE， 请各位指点. 有点长，多谢了：
背景：
MS, BioMed， 目前 research staff at university
Publication 9 (all English, IF 7-20+), first author: 0; second author 3.
Citation:>200
reviewer: 10
Recommendation letter: 5 (2 independent)
找律师办的，PL 的background&achievement部分主要列了contribution 和impact/
recognition.
当时递上去的时候，主要担心没有first author的paper，所以先递NIW.
今天来了个RFE，主要是针对impact. For example, "while the petitioner's
articles were published in journals with high impact factors, the petitioner
did not submit any evidence to s... 阅读全帖 |
|
W*******e
发帖数: 817 | 48 请板上著名律师办的。
背景：
化学。 1月6号收到， 8月3号NOID。14篇paper （没有第一作者， 都是老板第一作）
， 16个review。求版内的xdjm帮忙看看还有救吗？还是取消申请？
以下是NOID的内容：
Although the beneficiary peer-reviewed 16 times for the ……(7 different
journal names), because peer review is routine in the field and, by itself,
is not indicative of or consistent with sustained national or international
acclaim, then USCIS cannot conclude that the beneficiary’s peer-review is
consistent with either a ‘level of expertise indicating that the individual
is one of that ... 阅读全帖 |
|
s********1
发帖数: 318 | 49 申请的EB1b，140刚刚批准，现在paraleagal 给我LD和我填表，准备一起file 485。
G－28表中有一个选项，问我和我LD是petitioner, applicant or respondent? 我们的
paraleagal 说我们都要选petitioner，但是似乎很多人说这种情况应该选applicant，
因为单位才是petitioner。
请问应该选哪个呢？多谢了。 |
|
f*****g
发帖数: 101 | 50 background:
Physics
20 journal publications and 5 conference proceedings (11 first authored)
1 patent
total citations: google scholar 360+, ISI 300+
Reviews: 14times, 2 for APL, 3 for PRL
claim 老三样：authorship, contributions and review
RFE:
(iv) Evidence of the beneficiary's participation, as a judge of the work of
others
this criterion has been met by the petitioner's submission of evidence
(v) Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic..
..contributions of major sign... 阅读全帖 |
|
