由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Physics版 - PRL 审稿意见, 还值得appeal 吗?
相关主题
PRL投稿physical review E 怎么只有一个reviewer??
PRL投稿碰到的问题请教PRL 二审疑问
PRB碰到一个bias的审稿意见,两个正面意见,如何申诉?兄弟们帮我看看这是不是意味着秒杀啊?
with editors 快三周了,怎么回事?PRL appeal 询问
同学们, 你们的 PRL 被句后都还rebuttal 吗?PRL 状态
遭遇PRL流氓审稿人请教如何查询PRL的投稿状态
APL审稿周期一般多长?PRL可以appeal几次啊?
Nature Physics 投稿 第三天:求问PRL状态
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: prl话题: review话题: physical话题: appeal话题: manuscript
进入Physics版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
w******8
发帖数: 115
1
1: 第一个(一天审完):The manuscript is well written and structured, and the
problem the
authors address is certainly interesting. However, due to the mainly
experimental/empirical work and the lack even of a semiquantitative
model for interpreting the experiments, my feeling is that PRL is not
the appropriate journal to publish this research. The manuscript could
perhaps be published in Physical Review E, provided that a convenient
model to explain the experimental findings can be added.
2:第二个指出一些问题,但都是我门可以回答的.
请问长问反驳有希望吗?应该怎样回答.我们的确没有自己推导的模型.
N***m
发帖数: 4460
2
你哪个方向的?

【在 w******8 的大作中提到】
: 1: 第一个(一天审完):The manuscript is well written and structured, and the
: problem the
: authors address is certainly interesting. However, due to the mainly
: experimental/empirical work and the lack even of a semiquantitative
: model for interpreting the experiments, my feeling is that PRL is not
: the appropriate journal to publish this research. The manuscript could
: perhaps be published in Physical Review E, provided that a convenient
: model to explain the experimental findings can be added.
: 2:第二个指出一些问题,但都是我门可以回答的.
: 请问长问反驳有希望吗?应该怎样回答.我们的确没有自己推导的模型.

l****u
发帖数: 3449
3
最恨的就是这种意见,没有具体指出问题,而是说不适合啊,不interesting啊,这种
就很难argue,因为这是很主观的感受

【在 w******8 的大作中提到】
: 1: 第一个(一天审完):The manuscript is well written and structured, and the
: problem the
: authors address is certainly interesting. However, due to the mainly
: experimental/empirical work and the lack even of a semiquantitative
: model for interpreting the experiments, my feeling is that PRL is not
: the appropriate journal to publish this research. The manuscript could
: perhaps be published in Physical Review E, provided that a convenient
: model to explain the experimental findings can be added.
: 2:第二个指出一些问题,但都是我门可以回答的.
: 请问长问反驳有希望吗?应该怎样回答.我们的确没有自己推导的模型.

j******i
发帖数: 244
4
可以找个理论的合作者啊

【在 w******8 的大作中提到】
: 1: 第一个(一天审完):The manuscript is well written and structured, and the
: problem the
: authors address is certainly interesting. However, due to the mainly
: experimental/empirical work and the lack even of a semiquantitative
: model for interpreting the experiments, my feeling is that PRL is not
: the appropriate journal to publish this research. The manuscript could
: perhaps be published in Physical Review E, provided that a convenient
: model to explain the experimental findings can be added.
: 2:第二个指出一些问题,但都是我门可以回答的.
: 请问长问反驳有希望吗?应该怎样回答.我们的确没有自己推导的模型.

w******8
发帖数: 115
5
状态还是with editors...
The resulting reports include a critique which is sufficiently adverse
that we cannot accept your paper on the basis of material now at hand.
We append pertinent comments.
If you feel that you can overcome or refute the criticism, you may
resubmit to Physical Review Letters. With any resubmittal, please
include a summary of changes made and a brief response to all
recommendations and criticisms
上面这句话的意思是编辑表示我们还可以继续更改对吗?是不是所有的拒信都这样?

【在 j******i 的大作中提到】
: 可以找个理论的合作者啊
N***m
发帖数: 4460
6
你不能忽视第一个审稿人的意见

【在 w******8 的大作中提到】
: 状态还是with editors...
: The resulting reports include a critique which is sufficiently adverse
: that we cannot accept your paper on the basis of material now at hand.
: We append pertinent comments.
: If you feel that you can overcome or refute the criticism, you may
: resubmit to Physical Review Letters. With any resubmittal, please
: include a summary of changes made and a brief response to all
: recommendations and criticisms
: 上面这句话的意思是编辑表示我们还可以继续更改对吗?是不是所有的拒信都这样?

h********2
发帖数: 43
7
不定量对PRL来说算是硬伤,这点比Nature都严格
不过整个半定量的模型也不能吧,修改一下看第一个人的态度。

【在 w******8 的大作中提到】
: 1: 第一个(一天审完):The manuscript is well written and structured, and the
: problem the
: authors address is certainly interesting. However, due to the mainly
: experimental/empirical work and the lack even of a semiquantitative
: model for interpreting the experiments, my feeling is that PRL is not
: the appropriate journal to publish this research. The manuscript could
: perhaps be published in Physical Review E, provided that a convenient
: model to explain the experimental findings can be added.
: 2:第二个指出一些问题,但都是我门可以回答的.
: 请问长问反驳有希望吗?应该怎样回答.我们的确没有自己推导的模型.

d******g
发帖数: 346
8
Sure. Never stop trying. But it is also important to make some improvement
of your paper.
t****a
发帖数: 3544
9
老板是大牛吗? 是的话一定要试
不是的话,appeal成功几乎不可能 不过可以用来增加经验值
w******8
发帖数: 115
10
老板是刚刚AP不久的.,编辑说可以resubmit,是不是不算Appeal?
好像我们这个不算Appeal,【 在 tayama (电饭煲上校挖坑专员) 的大作中提到: 】
相关主题
遭遇PRL流氓审稿人physical review E 怎么只有一个reviewer??
APL审稿周期一般多长?PRL 二审疑问
Nature Physics 投稿 第三天:兄弟们帮我看看这是不是意味着秒杀啊?
进入Physics版参与讨论
w******8
发帖数: 115
11
既然第一个说可以去投E, 编辑让我们重投,是不是说编辑对我们的工作还有点兴趣?

【在 N***m 的大作中提到】
: 你不能忽视第一个审稿人的意见
w******8
发帖数: 115
12
还是整个半定量模型把

【在 h********2 的大作中提到】
: 不定量对PRL来说算是硬伤,这点比Nature都严格
: 不过整个半定量的模型也不能吧,修改一下看第一个人的态度。

w******8
发帖数: 115
13
1: 第一个(一天审完):The manuscript is well written and structured, and the
problem the
authors address is certainly interesting. However, due to the mainly
experimental/empirical work and the lack even of a semiquantitative
model for interpreting the experiments, my feeling is that PRL is not
the appropriate journal to publish this research. The manuscript could
perhaps be published in Physical Review E, provided that a convenient
model to explain the experimental findings can be added.
2:第二个指出一些问题,但都是我门可以回答的.
请问长问反驳有希望吗?应该怎样回答.我们的确没有自己推导的模型.
N***m
发帖数: 4460
14
你哪个方向的?

【在 w******8 的大作中提到】
: 1: 第一个(一天审完):The manuscript is well written and structured, and the
: problem the
: authors address is certainly interesting. However, due to the mainly
: experimental/empirical work and the lack even of a semiquantitative
: model for interpreting the experiments, my feeling is that PRL is not
: the appropriate journal to publish this research. The manuscript could
: perhaps be published in Physical Review E, provided that a convenient
: model to explain the experimental findings can be added.
: 2:第二个指出一些问题,但都是我门可以回答的.
: 请问长问反驳有希望吗?应该怎样回答.我们的确没有自己推导的模型.

l****u
发帖数: 3449
15
最恨的就是这种意见,没有具体指出问题,而是说不适合啊,不interesting啊,这种
就很难argue,因为这是很主观的感受

【在 w******8 的大作中提到】
: 1: 第一个(一天审完):The manuscript is well written and structured, and the
: problem the
: authors address is certainly interesting. However, due to the mainly
: experimental/empirical work and the lack even of a semiquantitative
: model for interpreting the experiments, my feeling is that PRL is not
: the appropriate journal to publish this research. The manuscript could
: perhaps be published in Physical Review E, provided that a convenient
: model to explain the experimental findings can be added.
: 2:第二个指出一些问题,但都是我门可以回答的.
: 请问长问反驳有希望吗?应该怎样回答.我们的确没有自己推导的模型.

j******i
发帖数: 244
16
可以找个理论的合作者啊

【在 w******8 的大作中提到】
: 1: 第一个(一天审完):The manuscript is well written and structured, and the
: problem the
: authors address is certainly interesting. However, due to the mainly
: experimental/empirical work and the lack even of a semiquantitative
: model for interpreting the experiments, my feeling is that PRL is not
: the appropriate journal to publish this research. The manuscript could
: perhaps be published in Physical Review E, provided that a convenient
: model to explain the experimental findings can be added.
: 2:第二个指出一些问题,但都是我门可以回答的.
: 请问长问反驳有希望吗?应该怎样回答.我们的确没有自己推导的模型.

w******8
发帖数: 115
17
状态还是with editors...
The resulting reports include a critique which is sufficiently adverse
that we cannot accept your paper on the basis of material now at hand.
We append pertinent comments.
If you feel that you can overcome or refute the criticism, you may
resubmit to Physical Review Letters. With any resubmittal, please
include a summary of changes made and a brief response to all
recommendations and criticisms
上面这句话的意思是编辑表示我们还可以继续更改对吗?是不是所有的拒信都这样?

【在 j******i 的大作中提到】
: 可以找个理论的合作者啊
N***m
发帖数: 4460
18
你不能忽视第一个审稿人的意见

【在 w******8 的大作中提到】
: 状态还是with editors...
: The resulting reports include a critique which is sufficiently adverse
: that we cannot accept your paper on the basis of material now at hand.
: We append pertinent comments.
: If you feel that you can overcome or refute the criticism, you may
: resubmit to Physical Review Letters. With any resubmittal, please
: include a summary of changes made and a brief response to all
: recommendations and criticisms
: 上面这句话的意思是编辑表示我们还可以继续更改对吗?是不是所有的拒信都这样?

h********2
发帖数: 43
19
不定量对PRL来说算是硬伤,这点比Nature都严格
不过整个半定量的模型也不能吧,修改一下看第一个人的态度。

【在 w******8 的大作中提到】
: 1: 第一个(一天审完):The manuscript is well written and structured, and the
: problem the
: authors address is certainly interesting. However, due to the mainly
: experimental/empirical work and the lack even of a semiquantitative
: model for interpreting the experiments, my feeling is that PRL is not
: the appropriate journal to publish this research. The manuscript could
: perhaps be published in Physical Review E, provided that a convenient
: model to explain the experimental findings can be added.
: 2:第二个指出一些问题,但都是我门可以回答的.
: 请问长问反驳有希望吗?应该怎样回答.我们的确没有自己推导的模型.

d******g
发帖数: 346
20
Sure. Never stop trying. But it is also important to make some improvement
of your paper.
相关主题
PRL appeal 询问PRL可以appeal几次啊?
PRL 状态求问PRL状态
请教如何查询PRL的投稿状态PRL 放在编辑手里11天了还没有动静是怎么回事?
进入Physics版参与讨论
t****a
发帖数: 3544
21
老板是大牛吗? 是的话一定要试
不是的话,appeal成功几乎不可能 不过可以用来增加经验值
w******8
发帖数: 115
22
老板是刚刚AP不久的.,编辑说可以resubmit,是不是不算Appeal?
好像我们这个不算Appeal,【 在 tayama (电饭煲上校挖坑专员) 的大作中提到: 】
w******8
发帖数: 115
23
既然第一个说可以去投E, 编辑让我们重投,是不是说编辑对我们的工作还有点兴趣?

【在 N***m 的大作中提到】
: 你不能忽视第一个审稿人的意见
w******8
发帖数: 115
24
还是整个半定量模型把

【在 h********2 的大作中提到】
: 不定量对PRL来说算是硬伤,这点比Nature都严格
: 不过整个半定量的模型也不能吧,修改一下看第一个人的态度。

w******8
发帖数: 115
25
反馈一下:文章接受了,谢谢大家。

【在 w******8 的大作中提到】
: 1: 第一个(一天审完):The manuscript is well written and structured, and the
: problem the
: authors address is certainly interesting. However, due to the mainly
: experimental/empirical work and the lack even of a semiquantitative
: model for interpreting the experiments, my feeling is that PRL is not
: the appropriate journal to publish this research. The manuscript could
: perhaps be published in Physical Review E, provided that a convenient
: model to explain the experimental findings can be added.
: 2:第二个指出一些问题,但都是我门可以回答的.
: 请问长问反驳有希望吗?应该怎样回答.我们的确没有自己推导的模型.

l********n
发帖数: 804
26
怎么appeal的
说说经验

【在 w******8 的大作中提到】
: 反馈一下:文章接受了,谢谢大家。
w******8
发帖数: 115
27
没有appeal.编辑说resubmission..然后我们就努力修改,第二关的时候第一轮据绝我
们的那个不审了,找了另外一个也没审。后来进入第三关,修改之后就接受了。

【在 l********n 的大作中提到】
: 怎么appeal的
: 说说经验

1 (共1页)
进入Physics版参与讨论
相关主题
求问PRL状态同学们, 你们的 PRL 被句后都还rebuttal 吗?
PRL 放在编辑手里11天了还没有动静是怎么回事?遭遇PRL流氓审稿人
Help for PRL MS statusAPL审稿周期一般多长?
PRL二审意见返回给编辑,编辑query to refereeNature Physics 投稿 第三天:
PRL投稿physical review E 怎么只有一个reviewer??
PRL投稿碰到的问题请教PRL 二审疑问
PRB碰到一个bias的审稿意见,两个正面意见,如何申诉?兄弟们帮我看看这是不是意味着秒杀啊?
with editors 快三周了,怎么回事?PRL appeal 询问
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: prl话题: review话题: physical话题: appeal话题: manuscript