x*****a
发帖数: 79 | | k***g
发帖数: 7244 | 2 hehe, I think it depends how you define the term, in relative sense or
absolute sense. Defining it in relative sense means that we could have
hegemonic stability even in a bi-polar balance-of-world world. In both blocs,
there is a hegemonic stability.(e.g. the US in the cold war and its allies).
It is also dependent on your view of history.
After the Nepoleonian War in Europe, some scholars say it is an example of
hegemonic stability where Britain is the hegemon. But some say that it is an
examp
【在 x*****a 的大作中提到】
: \
| x*****a
发帖数: 79 | 3 那absolute sense就是自由主义了?弱弱的问,但又觉得它不那么符合自由主义
【在 k***g 的大作中提到】
: hehe, I think it depends how you define the term, in relative sense or
: absolute sense. Defining it in relative sense means that we could have
: hegemonic stability even in a bi-polar balance-of-world world. In both blocs,
: there is a hegemonic stability.(e.g. the US in the cold war and its allies).
: It is also dependent on your view of history.
: After the Nepoleonian War in Europe, some scholars say it is an example of
: hegemonic stability where Britain is the hegemon. But some say that it is an
: examp
|
|
