l**p
发帖数: 474 | 1 Year Accepted Submitted Acceptance
SIGGRAPH 2004 83 478 17.4%
SIGGRAPH 2003 81 424 19 %
SIGGRAPH 2002 67 358 18.72 %
SIGGRAPH 2001 65 300 21.7 %
SIGGRAPH 2000 59 304 19.4 %
SIGGRAPH 1999 52 320 16.3 %
SIGGRAPH 1998 45 303 14.9 %
SIGGRAPH 1997 48 265 18.1 %
SIGGRAPH 1996 52 247 21 %
SIGGRAPH 1995 56 257 21.8 %
SIGGRAPH 1994 5 |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 2 nod,有些人知道如何play the tricks 来唬人。来制造papers而已。
象siggraph 2004,据说很多被最后接受的siggraph papers的平均得分很低。所以
committees争论的厉害。
和一些animation studios的人交流过，他说现在他们其实根本不是很care siggraph 上
的东西，因为他们可以做的很好(可能需要些人工)，但是it works.
also, siggraph deadline sucks.基本上正如你说的，没有寒假和christmas.....what a
life.
文
每
。
。 |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 3 hehe... they produced a lot of siggraph papers, but no any important award
from the siggraph community. it say something.
But I have to say they really master how to make siggraph-kind-of-taste papers
in a batch mode.
people in MSRA spend a lot of time to read and discuss every current/previous
year siggraph papers? (more than 80 per year). I doubt the same thing will
happen in any university graphics group.
On the other hand,
They (number is large too) work very hard, and should get something b |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 4 another fact about siggraph (it says siggraph is not prestigious at before):
it is true that siggraph submission each year is increasing, but slowly and
steadily.
several years ago, it accepted about 60 paper per year, last two years, it
accepted about 80 papers, this year (2005), it is said it accepted about 100
papers out of a little more than 400 paper submission.
accepted ratio is going toward ICCV and CVPR now.
for
get
of
limitation.
graphics
siggraph.
part
them |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 5 年年siggraph,都已经快麻木不仁了，趁还没有彻底麻木前，就来胡说几句。
今年siggraph 2004本来应该在东部开，不过听说除了在LA开能不亏钱，其余都亏钱，所
以临时移到LA召开。可是，对比3年前(siggraph 2001),同样的会议同样的Convention
center,我的感觉是参加人数大不以前。偌大的大厅和走廊上空荡的紧。看来siggraph也
进入中年危机了。
先来说paper,听了几个sessions,有些还是不错的。有些就很boring,基本上偶是听不下去
就中途溜出去了(也许是presenter讲的不好？)。不过，也许没有什么特别的大的excitin
g stuff,我觉得听paper的人不多。除了character animation sessions，听众是几乎满
座，许多的sessions都有大量的空位。看来对animation(尤其是和人相关)是大家共同的
兴趣。
再来说说emerging technologies, 大致都看了一下，没有什么特别的感觉。印象比较深
刻的是那个3D TV和3D 显示屏，觉得比较好玩。再说那个展览(exhibitio |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 6 you didn't get my comments.
The key point is that with less and less graphics contents in the siggraph,
why graphics industry should care?funny.
Look, those film and gaming industry can't use image and video processing
papers. Most of these works can be done by hiring some proficient Photoshop
users/animators.
Yes, graphics is very mature, and siggraph is becoming another ICCV. that's
fine.
I don't need you to tell the name, but I can tell you they have more times to
be siggraph committees than |
|
l**p
发帖数: 474 | 7 Siggraph是怎样一个地方？您只要知道它总是在夏季开幕，而且通常都是在热死人的地
方举办。这玩意不会在阿拉斯加办，冰岛可能也没什么机会拿到主办权吧。
不过啊，就算这真的是个大家避之唯恐不及的闷热地方，这些自视甚高而有些假慈悲的
Siggraph主办单位，还是试着把这一群忠贞不二的图形设计师、学术人员、程序员以及
厂商们给拉进展场中，稍微提振一些低迷的景气。
接着带您看看展览吧。
我的天哪，是NV30耶！呃，是吗？
「呃，我想你不会相信啦，不过我觉得喔…那个Nvidia啊…好象放出NV30的规格了说。
」
「闭嘴！」
「真想去看看！」
「别说了啦！我才不相信呢。」
「我可很相信呢。」
看到在Siggraph展中走道两侧展示的惊人影像后，我发现在Nvidia的Cg展示中隐含着NV
3x的规格。这也许让忙碌的Nvidia行销人员，能够以这些展示引导参观者了解其中含意
。不过各位啊，下一次你们能不能直接拿一份PowerPoint演示文稿给我，顺便帮我们写
一份介绍呢？
如果您不知道Cg是什么，或是懒得去Google搜寻它的意思，在这边我提一下。Cg代表的
是「图形技术的C语言（C for |
|
h*****d
发帖数: 112 | 8
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What do you mean "no any imporant award"? U mean "Siggraph achievement award"?
Harry will win it in the future, mark my word! Now, Harry is too senior to be
considered for "young graphics researcher award".
Do not look down graphics groups in MSRA because they are from BJ, China.
Graphics lab in MSRA is as good as any graphics groups in the world, if not
better. Harry has been in siggraph committee only two times. But how many MSRA
papers got ac |
|
l**p
发帖数: 474 | 9 寄信人: Princy (PingPing)
标 题: Re: 有人去今年的SIGGRAPH conference吗？
发信站: The unknown SPACE (Tue Jun 3 10:19:43 2003)
来 源: 61.135.
hi, 版主， 能否帮我发一封邮件问一下是否有人愿意Siggraph期间同住酒店， 似乎单床
间都被订完了， 我准备26号到， 31号走， 有意请速联系 i****[email protected] 多谢！
！
|
|
w****e
发帖数: 9 | 10 【 以下文字转载自 EE 讨论区,原文如下 】
发信人: zalex (zalex), 信区: EE
标 题: [转载]代友发文(女)：[征]SIGGRAPH'03 roommate!!!
发信站: The unknown SPACE (Wed Jun 4 22:32:41 2003) WWW-POST
【 以下文字转载自 Family 讨论区,原文如下 】想了半天不知道该发到哪个版去，这里
人气旺，就请各位看见的帮帮忙了！多谢了！
寻7月底在San Diego 的SIGGRAPH'03 会议期间的hotel roommate （female）。我的朋
友是女生，因为老板给的budget不多，同行的又没有女生，如果有哪位jjmm愿意搭个伴，
给我发信！可以一起订hotel了。 |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 11 thanks. 这个数据恰恰证明对于siggraph来说，LA还算是个希望之城。
2002在san antonio 估计人数更少(我当时也去了)。
亏
center,我的感觉是参加人数大不以前。偌大的大厅和走廊上空荡的紧。看来siggraph
听
就中途溜出去了(也许是presenter讲的不好？)。不过，也许没有什么特别的大的excitin
是
家
象 |
|
s***n
发帖数: 9499 | 12 给TOG的作者一个机会，让他们在Siggraph上present，这样大概可以提高TOG投稿人的积
极性。
反正TOG一年也就20多篇，Siggraph加不加上TOG最后present的都是100篇左右。 |
|
j*******i
发帖数: 45 | 13 国内北大的一个教授，要来New Orleans参加Siggraph，希望找到这边参会的人，一起
行动，相互有
个照应。请给我站内发个Email。 |
|
h*d
发帖数: 19309 | 14 发信人: accueil (。), 信区: TsinghuaCent
标 题: SIGGRAPH 2010,清华成绩不错
发信站: 水木社区 (Tue Jun 8 09:38:17 2010), 站内
清华是2篇（通信作者）+4篇（第一作者）+2篇（郭百宁挂名）
Line Space Gathering for Single Scattering in Large Scenes () ()
Xin Sun, (Microsoft Research Asia), Kun Zhou (Zhejiang University), Steve
Lin (Microsoft Research Asia), Baining Guo (Microsoft Research Asia and
Tsinghua University, Beijing)
Interactive Hair Rendering Under Environment Lighting
Zhong Ren (Microsoft Research Asia), Kun Zhou, Tengfei Li, Wei Hua (Zh |
|
w***n
发帖数: 1084 | 15 SIGGRAPH bar is going down, so... |
|
|
w***n
发帖数: 1084 | 17 cmft. 3.3 is a little bit below the chance. Usually 3.5 is the bar. Besides, 2.5 and 1.5 makes it much tougher if any of them is senior reviewer.
In general, it's not hard if you know how to sell your paper and write your paper in a SIGGRAPH fashion. |
|
g*l
发帖数: 7 | 18 其实SIGGRAPH就是那几个鸟人的俱乐部。鸟人定出的调调，你丫不服就不鸟你。每年的文
章被他们瓜分以后，还剩的五篇左右扔给你们争抢啄食。庆幸本人已经跳出此方向了。每
年又可以过圣诞节啦。
大
好 |
|
l**j
发帖数: 312 | 19 MSRA is really a good place. The first SIGGRAPH paper from HK (with firs
t author from HKUST) was produced when they were visiting MSRA. One of t
he authors from HKUST went to CUHK as faculty afterwards. |
|
a**o
发帖数: 2 | 20 MSRA did very well on Siggraph publications. But it doesn't mean that their
research is top enough. |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 21 I don't think "significant new researcher award" has obvious age limitation.
How old is Prof. Steven Gortler at Harvard? he got it in 2002.
Yes, Harry is in paper committees twice (including this year), it happen that
these two years MSRA has the maximum performance (or has the most papers
accepted in the two years, not the other years). Draw a simple curve, you may
find it out.
But anyway, siggraph although keep a "graphics" name on it, but the graphics
contents is less and less...More and more |
|
h*****d
发帖数: 112 | 22 Lot of arguments here are from your own guess..
If you want to be considered for "new reseracher award", you need to apply for
it first. Harry will not consider it at all. Mcmillan will not apply for it
either. Steve applied for it because I guess he wanted to get this award for
his tenure at havard.
You might not know where this "new reserach award" is from.. This award is
there simply because siggraph wants to help young researchers in academia get
their tenures in good univerities..
Your comm |
|
n********t
发帖数: 63 | 23 How do you guys know the results of this year's SIGGRAPH? Did you receive the
final results?
it
for
me
kind
you |
|
h*****d
发帖数: 112 | 24 I doubt you know Image-based rendering well while you still talk about this
like you are an expert in this area. Learn to read those 100+ IBR papers
first. Mcmillan is more respected researcher than Debevic in IBR. period.
I guess I might know more than you in terms of both graphics research and
those siggraph tricks. If you think Zoran, Mathieu, Paul and steve are better
than Harry, Mcmillan or even Brien Curless, then I am going to stop arguing
against you.
to
it
for
pinnacle
me
shit |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 25 your guess could be wrong. hehe. In bbs, the rule is that you don't need to
guess or
link too much to reality. You can speak what you truly think about. I guess
you know it. :(
You know what, the argument is switched from MSRA to siggraph trend. The
latter one is the main argument I want to discuss/argue.
just
of
time
the
period.
and
top |
|
S*********r
发帖数: 4729 | 26 Maybe because this year he is going to be the chair of ICCV.
So people in committee have to give him some face. hehe.
limitation.
to
graphics
siggraph.
part
them
to
China. |
|
x******r
发帖数: 367 | 27 I will also go to the siggraph.
I have not reserved room yet.
Do we have to reserve rooms so early? |
|
t**n
发帖数: 58 | 28 SIGGRAPH website gives out the list of the accepted papers.
So many papers are from animation companies.
The category has been changed.
Microsoft,Asia has 4 papers, some tsinghua students are intern there,
so Tsinghua also appear as 2nd,3rd or 4th author. |
|
l**p
发帖数: 474 | 29 Volume rendering is not very hot in SIGGRAPH. But still there are couple of
people give course on that topic.
To find more volume rendering stuff, should go to IEEE Visualization.. It
will be in Boston this year at teh end of Oct.
Count the papers from Microsoft Asia ( Beijing). They have 4 this year. Shum
did very good job. Just wonder how futher could they push next year. |
|
w****e
发帖数: 9 | 30 有人去今年的SIGGRAPH conference吗？ |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 31
，
2001),同样的会议同样的Convention
center,我的感觉是参加人数大不以前。偌大的大厅和走廊上空荡的紧。看来siggraph
下
就中途溜出去了(也许是presenter讲的不好？)。不过，也许没有什么特别的大的excitin
乎
同
较
论
cute.
so pixar is the same as 2003's.
system
是
候
好
hehe...yes.
个 |
|
l**p
发帖数: 474 | 32 I will not go to SIGGRAPH this year. :( |
|
o******r
发帖数: 259 | 33 Any bulls here ever get accepted by Siggraph?
Report here to let us know.
Just admire. |
|
G***U
发帖数: 38 | 34 My mentor in MSRA, by the time I was there, will give a joint siggraph
course with your advisor and other notable figures this year.
That shall be sufficient to reveal my identity. :) |
|
c*****z
发帖数: 182 | 35 seems that siggraph is becoming image processing conference |
|
|
r******l
发帖数: 10760 | 37 有些叫Transaction on Graphics Technical Papers，有些叫SIGGRAPH Core。有什么
不同？类似full paper和short paper么？还是前者是那种被拒了推荐到TOG里去的？ |
|
r******l
发帖数: 10760 | 38 刚发现有的竟然是07年10月的TOG上的，那时候SIGGRAPH08还没截稿吧？总不可能没截
稿就已经确定接收了吧？
要不就是早先投的，已经发在TOG上的又投了SIGGRAPH08了？这样不算一稿两投？
还是说以后SIGGRAPH会从已经发表的TOG文章里面挑选好的再收一遍？ |
|
N*D
发帖数: 3641 | 39 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
POMDP (POMDP) 于 (Tue Oct 12 18:56:28 2010, 美东) 提到:
lol,
你先说说msr redmon搞vision的组叫什么, 里面有什么人, 比google, 也别bing
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
mitbbs2012 (老邢他姐) 于 (Tue Oct 12 19:18:50 2010, 美东) 提到:
我不搞vision的，我就知道michael cohen，christopher bishop，graphics和hci的我
知道不少，呵呵。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
trandora (Trandora is not Fedora) 于 (Tue Oct 12 19:28:02 2010, 美东) 提到:
看你这么自信，就按你要求的，在 siggraph 上，把 msr 和 top10 学校加起
来比，展示一下 msr ... 阅读全帖 |
|
d**e
发帖数: 6098 | 40 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
boysd (boysd) 于 (Wed May 30 17:17:27 2012, 美东) 提到:
双码工和双FACULTY都是非典型案例。
我觉得AVERAGE码工在湾区大概能拿到12，3万（不是人人都是FLG的，而且好像超过17
万要多交5%的联邦税）。老婆干一般行业，7，8万。一家20万。物价贵，税高，学区性
价比差。
然后FACULTY大农村8万多，老婆完全待业不可能把，FACULTY老婆至少MASTER吧，怎么
也能挣个4，5万把，一家13万。但物价便宜，学区性价比好。
我说的都是起始工资。
干到退休。谁详细算算？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wwzz (一辈子当码工) 于 (Wed May 30 17:19:05 2012, 美东) 提到:
你挖坑专业的PHD？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
boysd (boysd) 于 (Wed May 30 17:20:08 ... 阅读全帖 |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 41 今天决定花点时间来码字说说这三个会议(SIGGRAPH, SIGMOD, SIGCOMM)以及在各自领域
内的其余会议。
(1)SIGGRAPH,计算机图形学年会，以近3万人的每年注册人数当之无愧是ACM 内的第一大
会议。
就算跳出ACM来看，也少有会议规模超过Siggraph.据说在美国只有有限几个城市有会议中
心能有资格被考虑siggraph, 如LA, Orlando,因为实在太多了人。 每年开会间，通常是
媒体云集来报导。
每年大约有400~500篇paper submission,接受率在20%或更低。
siggraph每篇paper有5个reviewer,很多的其余领域的top conference
paper却只有3个reviewer.
数量没有过千，另外一个很重要的原因是：graphics内的其余一流或者准一流会议，如
I3D,EG,基本上和siggraph是同一个deadline或者刚好早于siggraph.这些会议(如I3D)也
分担了一下一流的work.
在这些会议后，紧接着有一些会议follow up,主要接受前面这些会议被锯掉的papers,所
以都可以广泛 |
|
l**p
发帖数: 474 | 42 Computer Graphics 属于Computer Science 中应用方向的一个分支。这里就抛砖引玉，
谈一谈几个熟悉的会议，请大家补充。Computer Graphics 中最鼎鼎大名的就是SIGGRA
PH了。其会议全称是：International Conference on Computer Graphics and Intera
ctive Techniques. SIGGRAPH是ACM SIG之一。SIGGRAPH是一个盛会式的会议。除了Pap
er,还有很大规模的展览。98年 SIGGRAPH的与会者人数达到了创纪录的 48700。现在维
持在30000上下。SIGGRAPH paper的接受率大约接近20%. 而实际上递交到SIGRRAPH的文
章质量都很高，其录取难度要比接受率接近的其他会议高得多。
其他Computer Graphics 的会议和SIGGRAPH就至少差了一个档次。SIGGRAPH下来是 Eur
ographics. 虽然是欧洲的会议，但也是面向世界。接受率现在也有差不多20%.但是每次
会议参加人数就少的多，就是5-600。还有不错的 |
|
l**p
发帖数: 474 | 43 Computer Graphics 属于Computer Science 中应用方向的一个分支。这里就抛砖引玉，
谈一谈几个熟悉的会议，请大家补充。Computer Graphics 中最鼎鼎大名的就是SIGGRA
PH了。其会议全称是：International Conference on Computer Graphics and Intera
ctive Techniques. SIGGRAPH是ACM SIG之一。SIGGRAPH是一个盛会式的会议。除了Pap
er,还有很大规模的展览。98年 SIGGRAPH的与会者人数达到了创纪录的 48700。现在维
持在30000上下。SIGGRAPH paper的接受率大约接近20%. 而实际上递交到SIGRRAPH的文
章质量都很高，其录取难度要比接受率接近的其他会议高得多。
其他Computer Graphics 的会议和SIGGRAPH就至少差了一个档次。SIGGRAPH下来是 Eur
ographics. 虽然是欧洲的会议，但也是面向世界。接受率现在也有差不多20%.但是每次
会议参加人数就少的多，就是5-600。还有不错的 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 44
老板自身水平有限，学生都是自己做，以前毕业要求也是随意的。自从有一个师兄搞了
一篇SIGGRAPH之后，老板觉得原来组里面是可以出这样的文章的。结果后面就只让投
SIGGRAPH，只让投SIGGRAPH，不中的paper改了继续投，只让投SIGGRAPH。
所以我们学生各种没脾气啊，跑出去找能做SIGGRAPH的组，自己做，跟别人做，先把数
量搞到系里的要求。最后就算老板各种卡，闹到系里面，那至少也有毕业走人的可能性
的。Thesis啥的，数量够了，跟别人合作的写明自己的贡献，这些也是可行的。
推荐信的话，不指望了。老板也没啥connection，自己另想其他招吧。 |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 45 faint, 拿siggraph和这些会议相比，根本就不是公正比较。
siggraph是CS的top of the top conference, graphics和vision的人投稿居多。 而你说
的那些ICC,ICASSP etc.
压根就是EE人的会议。而且通常规定maximum page 是4页。而siggraph呢，你真的有货，
你写个14页也没有问题发表。也因为siggraph的关注程度，graphics的顶尖杂志ACM ToG
都要为此做一个speicial issue
(也就是所有siggraph的会议paper自动成为这个ToG的journal
paper),因为只有这样，ToG的citation才会提高。就这样。
义
路
两
量
和
最后注册参加者比例等等都很重要;而且ICC2001年的录取率是54.8%,录取率好像比ICASSP |
|
l**p
发帖数: 474 | 46 时间过去几年，Graphics的会议也有不少变化，这里就是补充一个。
一个是EG的开会时间发生了变化。原来的时间是略晚于 SIGGRAPH,截稿时间接近。现在
是在秋天投稿，春天开会。从零八年开始， SIGGRAPH推出了 SIGGRAPH ASIA.所有的文
章全部入选ACM TOG.截稿时间在五月份。开会时间在十二月。这样的化将会出现三大会
议均匀地分布在全年，每四个月正好一次截稿。下面是2008年的时间表。
SIGGRAPH SIGGRAPH ASIA EUROGRAPHICS
截稿 23 January 2008 Late May 2008 September 26st, 2007
会议 11-15 August 2008 11-13 Dec. 2008 15-18 April, 2008
好处是几乎任何时候有好结果都可以投了。。坏处是从事做图形的人永无宁日，劳碌终
年。
在可视化方向也有不少的变化。一个是从2006年开始所有Vis和Infovis文章都会进入TV
CG.
EuroVis也向 IEEE 同行看齐。200 |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 47 that's enough. :) don't always think about siggraph.
let we think about another way.
in graphics,
siggraph accepted 90 papers, and the top ten graphics conferences/symposium (including siggraph) totally accepted less than TOTAL 450 papers annually.
and look at other fields, for example, computer vision.
top (ICCV or EECV + CVPR) accepted more than 500 papers each year (about 100 oral totally), so their oral = siggraph papers.
and second tire vision conf (ICPR, ACCV, etc.) accpeted other more tha |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 48 Also, I would like to add the following famous guys in graphics or animation.
1. Terzopoulos (NYU), very famous professors, and did a lot of great work in
graphics and vision.
2. Paul Debevec (USC), "SIGGRAPH 1st Outstanding Researcher Award" Winner for
its contribution in IBR, published more than 7 siggraph papers...
3, Mathieu Desbrun (USC), did a lot of work in animation and geometry, in
siggraph paper program committee several times..published more than 7 siggraph
Papers, I think.
4. Chris B |
|
j*****l
发帖数: 1624 | 49 嘿嘿，对头哈。。。就是他。。。他自己还开玩笑说，在msr混比在nv好混多了。因为
nv做硬件不能出错，msr做软件的没那么紧张。
不过他编程倒是真的牛，有的siggraph paper直接就他一个作者，写代码就是靠自己。
想想有几个faculty可以自己独立完成paper啊，而且还这么高产。
MS我只能说财大气粗。搞research就他家最牛了，全球这么多研究院。近年来google也
不错，不过graphics领域还少点，而且多和google本身的产品相关。
他在NV家虽是做产品，但是还是和他的老本行，texture息息相关。也不能说是浪费时间吧，也许进入工业界这个现实的世界，会有不一样的灵感。
不知道为什么他要去港大。今年我怕是去不成siggraph了，要回家陪家人。你们有谁去siggraph见到他不妨问一问。
他可以算是符合所有条件了，当过码工，进过工业界研究院，现在又是faculty.他的blog网上有，大家不妨看一看他的工作生活心境是怎么样的。 |
|
o***c
发帖数: 6 | 50 Strongly agree. Siggraph sucks. Lots of people go to Siggraph not for
the formal papers which in my opinions 99% are useless research
but for other activities held jointly with Siggraph, for example
GPU tutorial given by ATI or Nvidia. It becomes an industry
trade show or convention.
今年sig |
|
