H******i
发帖数: 4704 | 1 （1）EB1-5总名额是13万9千，
（2）如果这个网站信息准确，我们能够从中得到很多信息：
http://www.immigration-law.com/Canada.html
(壹)In FY 2011, the USCIS received only 78,303 new EB-485 applications
(贰)EB-485 takes about 85% of total annual EB visa numbers
(叁)the other 15% are used by the consular processes
(肆)78703/0.85=92121 也就是说FY2011总共递交了9万2千多EB移民申请
(伍)由于中印EB2很少有人能够在FY2011递交，这些申请可以认为是中印EB1、4、5和ROW的EB1、2、3、4、5的申请规模,假设FY2012年这些人的申请仍然在这个数字左右，或者略少些，大概至少也有八九万，即使奥本和USCIS不浪费名额，中印EB23也只有四五万名额可用
(陆)既然FY2011年实际批准EB申请是12万3千3百零5，那么似乎奥本与USCIS... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
M*N
发帖数: 435 | 3 我只是基于现有的数据
我对SEPT VB 和FY2011 spill over的估计都比版上的大多人要保守点
我也在等, 所以做了点功课, 给自己一个期望. 既然功课做好了, 就拿来跟大家分享一
下. 不过只是一家之言而已. 一切都要看SEPT VB 和FY2011 的SPILL OVER |
|
j*e
发帖数: 1987 | 4 of course "FY2011收的不等于FY2011批的" , most EB-2 I & C approved in 2011 were received in 2007 |
|
|
i*****r
发帖数: 372 | 6 请问大家的QUARTLY SPILLOVER是基于AUG VB中的这段话吗?
INA Section 202(a)(5)(A), added by the American Competitiveness in the 21st
Century Act (AC21), provides that if total demand will be insufficient to
use all available numbers in a particular Employment preference category in
a calendar quarter,...
如是, 请恕我直言,这个"in a calendar quarter" 在以前的很多文件中就有了. 可实
际上在操作中, DOS 仅用于EB1上, 对EB2还是到年底才分的.所以不能依此判断DOS在
FY2011执行QUARTLY SPILLOVER. |
|
c***3
发帖数: 527 | 7 good point.
发信人: iceicer (水冰儿), 信区: EB23
标 题: Re: 我对FY2011年度QUARTLY VB的预测
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Jul 21 21:15:27 2010, 美东)
以前有一些VB中提到AC21时也同时指明是calendar quater, 而且也在其他的一些说明
文件中出现过, 就连法律原文中也是说的calender quater, DOS还不是一直没有执行.
不过下面举的例子到是第一次出现. 我也希望有所改变, 对EB2C/I有好处. 不过提醒大
家要小心了, 他们很会玩文字游戏.
还有, 如果的确是QUATERLY SPILLOVER, 要防止在一种情况下EB2C排期于季度末停止或
后退与EB2I平. |
|
H**********k
发帖数: 2158 | 8 趁群龙无首,浑水摸鱼，也问一下PD NOV 20,2006的EB2C，FY2011年底前能排到吗？ |
|
p*****c
发帖数: 58 | 9 Department of Labor made decisions on 59,459 labor certificates for green
card during the first 9 months of FY2011: 9,316 were denied and 2,238 were
withdrawn. Following are the top countries, jobs and employers in Business &
Finance (update career profile to get customized visa job solution):
2011 Top Green Card Countries
1India28,363
2South Korea3,360
3China3,245
4Mexico3,237
5Canada2,767
6Philippines2,310
7Pakistan893
8Japan871
9United Kingdom834
Green Card for Workers From Your Country
2011 ... 阅读全帖 |
|
g*****g
发帖数: 34805 | 10 就这个页面里不是写着FY2011 EB485 approval 123,305。
78,303是new receipt.
posts |
|
d*********y
发帖数: 748 | 11 我想问一下，如果FY2011， EB 绿卡批了 123305,由于每年绿卡名额是14万，是不是浪
费了16695个名额？ |
|
l*****n
发帖数: 1068 | 12 留个复印件，顶一把
发信人: jwe (Mike), 信区: EB23
标 题: Re: 根据JWE的解释，FY2011没有浪费名额（12条推理）
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Jan 8 16:01:47 2012, 美东)
要推动一个bill在国会通过，第一步就是雇佣游说公司。
IV是雇佣了游说公司的，这个我早就做过研究，see http://www.niunational.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=981&extra=page%3D2。
雇佣游说公司需要的大量的资金支持，印度人多势众，捐款自然也多。
美国的游说机构，说白了就是国内的请客送礼走后门拉关系，只是它是明目张胆合法化
形式化了。说客很多是以前的国会议员，政府官员，反正与国会有着千丝万缕的联系。
美国这个社会，本质上就是一个金钱社会，有钱能使鬼推磨，没钱啥事办不成。任何一
个法案都是背后利益集团博弈的结果。
靠NIU现在每月2位数这点捐款，你说能推动啥bill？俗话说有钱出钱，有力出力，现在
是能出力的没几个，能出钱的也不出钱，这就是现状。
当然NIU也没就此罢休，本来... 阅读全帖 |
|
r********n
发帖数: 1162 | 13 From the Indian website:
The tables represent the FY (October to September) that PERM applications
with Priority Date in a Calendar Year were Certified.
As an example, say you wanted to know the number of PERM for Indian
applicants with a PD in 2007 Certified in FY2008. First go to the table for
India, then the FY2008 column. Go down the column until you reach 2007. The
resulting figure, 8,335, is the number of PERM with a PD of 2007 Certified
in FY2008 for Indian applicants.
If you wanted to kn... 阅读全帖 |
|
r********n
发帖数: 1162 | 14 Approval date means nothing. Detailed analysis is here:
CHINA ----- FY2007 -- FY2008 -- FY2009 -- FY2010 -- FY2011 Q1-Q2 -- CY Total
2005 --------- 186 ------- 8 ------- 0 ------- 0 ------------- 0 ------- 194
2006 ------- 3,053 ------ 39 ------ 16 ------- 3 ------------- 0 ----- 3,111
2007 ------- 3,607 --- 1,916 ----- 179 ----- 198 ------------- 5 ----- 5,905
2008 ----------- 0 --- 1,365 --- 1,915 ----- 666 ----------- 188 ----- 4,134
2009 ----------- 0 ------- 0 ------- 2 --- 2,169 ----------... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 15 Jan. 27, 2011
WASHINGTON—U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced
today that it has received a sufficient number of H-1B petitions to reach
the statutory cap for fiscal year (FY) 2011. USCIS is notifying the public
that yesterday, Jan. 26, 2011, is the final receipt date for new H-1B
specialty occupation petitions requesting an employment start date in FY2011.
The final receipt date is the date on which USCIS determines that it has
received enough cap-subject petitions to rea... 阅读全帖 |
|
s**u
发帖数: 9035 | 16 According to DOS released NVC 11/1/2010 data, there are as huge as 1022
EB2C cases (PD before 6/1/2006) and 3350 EB2I cases(PD before 5/8/2006) are
being precessed in US overseas Consulate.
It means in Guangzhou US Consulate, there are large number of EB2C cases are
being processed. For whole FY2011 year, EB2C has only 2800 visa numbers.
We soppose USCIS process 60% of visa numbers, Guangzhou US Consulate process
40% of visa numbers, VB will move very very slow in FY2011. Guangzhou US
Consulate... 阅读全帖 |
|
r********n
发帖数: 1162 | 17 从老印网站上看到：奥傻精确计算让PD停在2007年4月，让老中在2012年财政年开始时
需求3200大于2800，这样老中就必须和老印绑在一起，这样老中就不可以交新的485，
只有等到明年暑假才能和老印前进，看来奥傻太他妈的黑了！
Very well said. I agree w you. The dates in 2011 are so cleverly crafted
that USCIS has eliminated a lot of backlog but at the same time kept enough
to ensure they have discretion to make any further movement. EB2C has just
enough backlog that puts them in exactly same fate as EB2I in terms of any
SFM or BTM.
I am not sure why it should have any effect.
At the beginning of FY2012, ... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
f**u
发帖数: 2769 | 19 计算原理：财年中 demand 减少量 - 实批量 = EB3 升级量
数据来源： data 点 niunational 点 org/demand/eb3i
data 点 niunational 点 org/iv-stats
FY2012: (9/8/2011 demand) 54,000
- (9/10/2012 demand) 47,550
- (FY 2012 实际批准) 2,758
----------------------------
= 3,692
FY2011: (9/8/2010 demand) 60,050
- (9/8/2011 demand) 54,000
- (FY2011 实际批准) 3,954
----------------------------
= 2,096
这个计算方法假定所有 EB3 demand 额外减少都是因为升级，而没有考虑其他造成
demand
减少的原... 阅读全帖 |
|
p**8
发帖数: 3883 | 20 1. 大小年是因为USCIS的处理能力，和RECESSION没太多的关系。比如今年从7月开始的
EB2IC大潮，就导致了数以千计的EB1和EB2ROW审批延误。但是他们的排期是current，
FY2011中必须批他们，这样FY2011的剩余名额会少几千。也就是，大年等于平均数加几
千，小年等于平均数减几千。
2.据猎头告诉我，现在的就业市场很好。他们追着我，要resume，去interview，接受
offer。而且offer的base salary是按你的要求给。
3. by the way, I can not visit any BBS in office after 2 weeks, because of
new company's internet policy. |
|
r********n
发帖数: 1162 | 21 2010年PERM分析：
1。FY2010是从10/1/2009-10/1/2010。
2。因为ROW二类没有排期，所以基本上从PERM批准到拿到卡是3个月
3。估计PERM在2010年7月1日以前批准的ROW二类已经拿到卡了
4。所以我们只需要考虑2010年7月1日以后批准的ROW EB2对我们的冲击
5。2010年7月1日以后批准的PERM总共15113，其中烙印7452，老中951，ROW是8000左右
6。这8000ROW对我们FY2011的老中EB2造成冲击，假设其中6000是EB2
7。假设每人带个配偶，6000*2=12000
结论：
1。去年（2009.10-2010.10）之所以剩余名额少就是因为2010年7月1日之前批准的ROW
人太多(7月以前至少5万多批准的，其中至少一半是ROW)
2。2010.07-2010.10批准的ROW EB2估计会用FY2011的名额12000左右
3。需要注意的是最近PERM批准速度加快 |
|
S*******r
发帖数: 11017 | 22 不错的分析。
2010.07 - 2010.10就有EB2ROW6000人，FY2011尚有四分之三，如果如你所说EB2ROW从
PERM批准到485批准3个月的话，一直到2011-07批准的PERM-ROW都能占用FY2011年的EB2
名额，假设到2011-07之前再有10000EB2ROW批准，考虑拖家带口因素，1.6万×2=3.2万
。EB2全世界的名额是14万×28.6%=4万，刨去中印各自2800，3.2 + 0.56 = 3.76万，
可能今年EB2ROW溢出的剩余名额也就两三千个。老中估计值能拿个几百个而已。 |
|
Q*K
发帖数: 3464 | 23 基于NIU以前的一个模板，我写了一封信。高手们帮着改改，如果需要的话我们发给奥
本。
Dear Mr. Oppenheim:
This is New Immigrants United (NIU). We are sending this letter on behalf of
tens of thousands of legal immigrants from P.R. China in employment based
category 2 and 3 waiting for visa numbers.
First, we would like to express our appreciation in your effort in pushing
forward the cut-off date. In FY2011, we noticed there are positive signs in
resolving severe backlog of Chinese employment based immigrants. We are
hoping that with clo... 阅读全帖 |
|
r********n
发帖数: 1162 | 24 EB- INDIA
PD2007 - 14.2k (approval after July 2007)
PD2008 - 23.3k
PD2009 - 16.0k
PD2010 - 21.0k (up to FY2011 Q2 PERM disclosure)
Total - 74.5K
EB- China
PD2007 - 3.2k (approval after July 2007)
PD2008 - 4.1k
PD2009 - 2.2k
PD2010 - 2.3k (up to FY2011 Q2 PERM disclosure)
Total - 11.8K
Combined (EBI&C) Total = 86.3k (assume porting in = porting out, from this
total)
At least 70.0k out of 86.3k will be EB2, you can do the math now!
If you count the family members, the addtional visas needed are 70... 阅读全帖 |
|
T****k
发帖数: 1374 | 25 转Rocketsfan的帖：触目惊心！中国EB2的悲剧在于：只比自己quote多那么一点点，但
是要和A3一起分SO！被A3活火拖死！ICC不死，天理难容啊！
EB- INDIA
PD2007 - 14.2k (approval after July 2007)
PD2008 - 23.3k
PD2009 - 16.0k
PD2010 - 21.0k (up to FY2011 Q2 PERM disclosure)
Total - 74.5K
EB- China
PD2007 - 3.2k (approval after July 2007)
PD2008 - 4.1k
PD2009 - 2.2k
PD2010 - 2.3k (up to FY2011 Q2 PERM disclosure)
Total - 11.8K
Combined (EBI&C) Total = 86.3k (assume porting in = porting out, from
this
total)
At least 70.0k out of 86.3k will be EB2, you can do ... 阅读全帖 |
|
H**E
发帖数: 620 | 26 see the post by someone else :
PERM approved AFTER JULY 2007:
EB- INDIA
PD2007 - 14.2k (approval after July 2007)
PD2008 - 23.3k
PD2009 - 16.0k
PD2010 - 21.0k (up to FY2011 Q2 PERM disclosure)
Total - 74.5K
EB- China
PD2007 - 3.2k (approval after July 2007)
PD2008 - 4.1k
PD2009 - 2.2k
PD2010 - 2.3k (up to FY2011 Q2 PERM disclosure)
Total - 11.8K |
|
d******8
发帖数: 1972 | 27 05/13/2011: State Department Employment-Based Visa Demand Statistics Used to
Determine June 2011 Visa Bulletin for EB Categories
Readers must have noticed that we highlighted in the yesterday's reporting
of the State Department predictions for the coming months. As noted in the
prediction, the EB-2 visa cut-off date for India will depend on the volume
of EB-2 visa numbers by Chinese and Indians, mostly Indians, between January
and March or later statistics of USCIS in its EB-485 inventory for EB... 阅读全帖 |
|
A****S
发帖数: 978 | 28 EB- INDIA
PD2007 - 14.2k (approval after July 2007)
PD2008 - 23.3k
PD2009 - 16.0k
PD2010 - 21.0k (up to FY2011 Q2 PERM disclosure)
Total - 74.5K
EB- China
PD2007 - 3.2k (approval after July 2007)
PD2008 - 4.1k
PD2009 - 2.2k
PD2010 - 2.3k (up to FY2011 Q2 PERM disclosure)
Total - 11.8K
Indians approved 23.3k PERM in 2008!!!
It's much higher than our expectation.
We had a wrong conception that PERM went down after 2007, but the truth is
that the total number of Indian PERM didn't go down at all. I... 阅读全帖 |
|
k********o
发帖数: 1139 | 29 从http://blog.lucidtext.com找到的。去年一共批了1,885个EB5。不过，根据该网站的另一个统计，FY2011 Q1已经批了1,421个，所以预计FY 2011总数应该远大于FY2010，估计有5,000多吧。那么FY2011可用的EB5剩余应该是4,000-5,000。
EB-5 Visa Usage by Country 2010
February 10, 2011 by Suzanne (www.lucidtext.com) Leave a Comment
The U.S. Department of State has published their final visa usage statistics
for FY2010. A total of 1,885 EB-5 visas were issued, with the following
countries making up the Top 10:
1.People’s Republic of China (772 or 40.9%)
2.Republic of South Korea (29... 阅读全帖 |
|
r****e
发帖数: 3109 | 30 Published demand: 10142 (# of Non-CI EB2 485s that are pending as of 5/8/2011, see http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/EB23/31300599.html, this number includes EB2-ROW+Mexico+Philippines)
5/8 to 8/8 new submissions: ~1500 (estimated at around 500 per month), i.e., new non-CI EB2 485s to be submitted in this 3-month window; Submissions received after 8/8 won't affect Sept VB.
Total demand: ~11642
EB2 ROW quota for FY2011:
140000*0.286-2802*2=34436 [2802*2 for eb2-ic)
Total available for May-Sept FY2... 阅读全帖 |
|
r********n
发帖数: 1162 | 31 Totoally there are more than 72k Indian PERM and 11k China PERM from FY 2008
to FY 2011. I estimate the total demand will be 100k from this data.
CHINA ----- FY2007 -- FY2008 -- FY2009 -- FY2010 -- FY2011 Q1-Q2 -- CY Total
2005 --------- 186 ------- 8 ------- 0 ------- 0 ------------- 0 ------- 194
2006 ------- 3,053 ------ 39 ------ 16 ------- 3 ------------- 0 ----- 3,111
2007 ------- 3,607 --- 1,916 ----- 179 ----- 198 ------------- 5 ----- 5,905
2008 ----------- 0 --- 1,365 --- 1,915 ----- 6... 阅读全帖 |
|
r********n
发帖数: 1162 | 32 I don't want to upset you, but I want to show you this data:
EB- INDIA
PD2007 - 14.2k (approval after July 2007)
PD2008 - 23.3k
PD2009 - 16.0k
PD2010 - 21.0k (up to FY2011 Q2 PERM disclosure)
Total - 74.5K
EB- China
PD2007 - 3.2k (approval after July 2007)
PD2008 - 4.1k
PD2009 - 2.2k
PD2010 - 2.3k (up to FY2011 Q2 PERM disclosure)
Total - 11.8K
Combined (EBI&C) Total = 86.3k (assume porting in = porting out, from this
total) |
|
r********n
发帖数: 1162 | 33 Indian demand is sooooooooooooooo high..........speechless......
EB- INDIA
PD2007 - 14.2k (approval after July 2007)
PD2008 - 23.3k
PD2009 - 16.0k
PD2010 - 21.0k (up to FY2011 Q2 PERM disclosure)
Total - 74.5K
EB- China
PD2007 - 3.2k (approval after July 2007)
PD2008 - 4.1k
PD2009 - 2.2k
PD2010 - 2.3k (up to FY2011 Q2 PERM disclosure)
Total - 11.8K
Combined (EBI&C) Total = 86.3k (assume porting in = porting out, from this
total) |
|
r********n
发帖数: 1162 | 34 You got some chance to submit 485 next summer, but please be aware the
coming new demand in 2007 and 2008. I want to explain it based on the PERM
data.
PD 2008 demand: Indians have 23k PERM in 2008 and Chinese have 4k PERM in
2008.
PD 2007 demand: Indians have extra 14k PERM approved after 2007.07 and
Chinese have 3k PERM approved after 2007.07.
totally PERM demand between 2007 and 2008.12 is 44K.
CHINA ----- FY2007 -- FY2008 -- FY2009 -- FY2010 -- FY2011 Q1-Q2 -- CY Total
2005 --------- 186 ---... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***e
发帖数: 29053 | 35 Total demand is not Promising. See the numbers below from PERM disclosure
data, and PD based on Calender Year.
EB- INDIA
PD2007 - 14.2k (approval after July 2007)
PD2008 - 23.3k
PD2009 - 16.0k
PD2010 - 21.0k (up to FY2011 Q2 PERM disclosure)
Total - 74.5K
EB- China
PD2007 - 3.2k (approval after July 2007)
PD2008 - 4.1k
PD2009 - 2.2k
PD2010 - 2.3k (up to FY2011 Q2 PERM disclosure)
Total - 11.8K
Combined (EBI&C) Total = 86.3k (assume porting in = porting out, from this
total) |
|
|
r****f
发帖数: 869 | 37
不是很懂，求板上大牛解释一下，另外他在这段之前还有两段
“As per my calculation there were only 19200 EB2-I pending cases for all of
left over 2007, FY 2008, FY 2009. We are yet to see FY2011 approval data,
but I believe that EB2-I received around 25k GCs in FY2011. That means the
EB2-I 2009 (up to 31st Dec 20009) will get their GCs by the end of FY 2012,
including those who will port from EB3-I.
USCIS will move dates into 2010 mid to make its inventory. However, in my
opinion you will not see the inventory data greater th... 阅读全帖 |
|
y******0
发帖数: 8807 | 38 那就是说FY2010有10000多个到EB1和的2quote来自FY2009的FB？可以这么认为吗？
那么FY2010 FB已经超过226000的limit了，FY2011的EB是没有来自FB的，进而我们在考
虑FY2012 EB的时候也要考虑FY2011的FB？ |
|
f**u
发帖数: 2769 | 39 DOL网站上新公布的数据，如果 3012 通过，则非常有用。因为 FY2011 的实批数字决
定 FY2013 的保留名额分配。
根据这个数据，FY2011 EB2/3 实批数字之和，最大的两国不是印度和中国，而是印度
和韩国。
EB2 EB3+EW Total
China 8,257 2,542 10,799
India 23,997 4,002 27,999
S Korea 5,912 4,939 10,851
其他国家数字太少，就不列出了。有兴趣的可以自行研究
http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/FY11AnnualReport-Table%20V-Part
如果3012按照这个数据实施的话，FY2013 的 EB2 的情况如下：韩国的名额可以使之保
持C，除印度韩国外的其他国家（包括中国）一个排期(A)，印度单独一个排期(B)，其
中(A)>=(B)。
事实上，韩国排期不能超过ROW。于是就变成：印度一个排期(A)，全世界其他国家一
个排期(B)，其中(A)<=(B)。
根据“非保留名额”的分配... 阅读全帖 |
|
N*********L
发帖数: 517 | 40 参考FY2011的VB。当时EB2I排期在08MAY06停了7个月，从5月VB开始移动的，6月就和
EB2C平齐了。今年EB2I的情况比FY2011要严峻得多。 |
|
a********r
发帖数: 108 | 41 DOL年度Report上都有
FY2012，China PERM Received 3879， Certified 3354
FY2011，China PERM Received 4031， Certified 3441
印象中2010PD的 PERM 较为滞后，有超过1500+ 是在FY2011批的，就是说至少这些人中
绝大多数是2010年10月以后批的，140基本上都是2011年批了，不知道是不是2011年140
批准人数比2010和2012（前9个月）多的原因之一。 |
|
t******2
发帖数: 2265 | 42 16 US Cities Facing Bankruptcy If They Don't Make Deep Cuts In 2011
BONUS: Chicago, Ill.
Deficit through December 2011: $654 million Closed
Budget in FY2010: $6.8 billion
Annualized gap: 9.6%
Mayor Richard Daley has balanced the budget, but absolutely ruined Chicago
finances from here on.
His FY2011 plan uses up nearly the entire revenue from a long-term lease of
the local parking system and airport, which he passed in 2008. The multi-
billion lease deal was supposed to last for decades, but it ... 阅读全帖 |
|
M*P
发帖数: 6456 | 43 http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/blog/2011/02/short-read-archive
Dear Staff Members of NCBI,
As you are aware, the federal government as well as NIH is facing a
period of budgetary uncertainty that is resulting in ongoing program reviews
throughout the government. At NCBI our senior staff have been giving
serious consideration to our own projects and staffing levels in order to
prepare for and adjust to new fiscal constraints.
NCBI had received a significant adjustment in its approp... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*******s
发帖数: 954 | 44 请给你的参议员写信，， 反对国会削减NIH NSF 经费
『国会共和党多数提议消减$1.6 billion NIH 和 $826 million NSF经费】
Urge Your Senators to Oppose $2.4 Billion in Proposed Cuts to NIH
and NSF
Please contact your Senators TODAY
to support NIH and NSF funding. On February 19, the House
Republican majority passed legislation to reduce FY2011 funding
for science, including a $1.6 billion cut for NIH and an $826
million cut for NSF - reducing the NIH and NSF budgets to FY2008
levels. Debate about the future of funding now shifts to the
S... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*******s
发帖数: 954 | 45 【 以下文字转载自 Biology 讨论区 】
发信人: babysteps (A goal is a dream with a deadline), 信区: Biology
标 题: 请给你的参议员写信， 反对国会削减NIH NSF 经费
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Feb 28 12:46:14 2011, 美东)
请给你的参议员写信，， 反对国会削减NIH NSF 经费
『国会共和党多数提议消减$1.6 billion NIH 和 $826 million NSF经费】
Urge Your Senators to Oppose $2.4 Billion in Proposed Cuts to NIH
and NSF
Please contact your Senators TODAY
to support NIH and NSF funding. On February 19, the House
Republican majority passed legislation to reduce FY2011 funding
for science, includin... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*********d
发帖数: 3539 | 46 具体拨款过程我也不了解，拨款肯定不会已经全到。HR1的意思是国会要上修改器，压
着钱不发。巴马炮制FY2011的时候还
没中期选举呢，现在国会是在巴马嘴里拔牙。 |
|
m*******l
发帖数: 12782 | 47 【 以下文字转载自 EB23 讨论区 】
发信人: sfdg (猪坚强), 信区: EB23
标 题: 2011Perm中印之比已达1:10 老印已占EB半壁江山 不戴嚼子不行啊
关键字: perm data
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jan 31 08:42:02 2012, 美东)
为Grassley的office visit准备材料，发现：
2011Perm 中印之比已达1:10, 老印已占EB半壁江山, 不戴嚼子不行啊!
老印从08年的33.67%到11年的52.24%只用了4年，赶明儿70%都不奇怪。
材料来源：
http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/quarterlydata.cfm
FY2011 Permanent Foreign Labor Certification
COUNTRY CERITIFIED PERCENT
INDIA 31273 52.24%
CHINA 3448 5.76%
SOUTH KOREA 31... 阅读全帖 |
|
s****7
发帖数: 2507 | 48
就中央政府来说
美国fed gov operating cost 1.3TB, federal budger 3.5B in 2012. 37%的政府财政
预算是行政支出。
http://www.gao.gov/financial/fy2011/11guide.pdf
中国政府的
网上有篇文说中国行政公务支出占政府支出一度超36%
就是国家行政学院有一个教授，他写了一篇文章，在中央党校的《学习时报》上，他说
每年三公支出9000多亿。后来他们领导找他谈话，他就说这个数字 是周天勇的，后来
他没有来找我。我说这个不行，我得仔细算算到底花了多少，最后我就很保守的推算了
一个2008年的数字，大概是8000亿的三公支出，再加上人员工资、退休人员工资等等
加起来。最后加起来就是政府行政公务支出占政府全部支出也在36-37%，就是那一年，
可能这两年有所下降。
-------------
中美政府行政支出占政府支出的比例相当。
中国政府行政支出才0.145TB.大概是美国政府的11%。
美国GDP 15T.中国GDP8T
美国政府实在是太能花钱耳聋。 |
|
|
l*******1
发帖数: 16217 | 50 18亿美元一艘这个还是2011－2012财年的报价，7亿美元一艘，你美爹睡觉都要乐醒了
，白痴！！！
Operators: United States Navy
Preceded by: Kidd class
Succeeded by: Zumwalt class
Cost: US$1.843 billion per ship (DDG 114–116, FY2011/12) |
|
