由买买提看人间百态

topics

全部话题 - 话题: overlap
首页 上页 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 下页 末页 (共10页)
z****e
发帖数: 3810
1
文青太有学问了。。。

的群众
持认为应该是“套边插上”,交叉换位不是这个词。
后等A直传,那种套边不叫overlap)
w*********s
发帖数: 8428
2
读了这段话我没看出来换位的意思。如果换位的话,己方后卫怎么直接暴露在对方火力
下?

emerged
run
security, so that a missed attempt at an overlap did not expose the full-
back, but also
midfielder
switched quickly from one flank to the other.
队员不应越过边锋去追求交叉套边插上的效果,这么做部分是为了确保防线的安全,以
免因交叉套边插上的失误使得己方边后卫暴露于敌人的反击火力之下。另一部分原因是
为了给自己的边锋留出足够的纵深。中场球员在身后给予支持就行了,必要的时候他们
还可以及时将球从一路转移到另一侧。
p****s
发帖数: 32405
3
这倒是恰好可以解释啊。
假定这个overlap发生在右路哈。己方配置里一开始是这么个样子:
MC RM
RB
按照我们理解的交叉模型:
1. RM带球往中路移
2. MC绕过RM朝右上边路跑
完成交叉后的样子:
MC
RM
RB
如果RM此时和MC直接传切中途被人断了,因为RM已经调去了中路,RB身前就空了。
你觉得这个理解如何?
如果是简单的MC套边,边路可能变成三层呢反而厚实了:
MC
RM
RB
空出来的是中路
p*y
发帖数: 735
4
overlap可以到处有,前插,后撤,左右的跑动都可以是。类似补位,不过是主动的而
不是真的失位了其他位置去补。看战术了。
m**i
发帖数: 9848
5
对的,足球经理里有选项是look for overlap,就是指的边后卫插上。
g******n
发帖数: 283
6
顶这个.
overlap到处都可以做,不必交叉.
S********0
发帖数: 5749
7

的群众
持认为应该是“套边插上”,交叉换位不是这个词。
后等A直传,那种套边不叫overlap)
绝对的交叉换位啊, 至于第二个视频里, 应该是既有交叉换位也有套边插上,只是人
家套边不是传统意义的踩着边线套,而是多了个换位到边路
多句话,你那哥们不专业啊
z**********i
发帖数: 9546
8
同意这个。
Overlap,字面意思本身就是说己方两队员的区域产生动态重叠(非站桩式蛋痛重叠)
。后面的说的是可选择性战术发展,Option。
要不“动态重叠”?哇哈哈哈。

2.
y***n
发帖数: 1666
9
overlap太大了。
很多征婚要求其实都快接近完美了。
差不多身高体重,差不多年薪相貌,差不多脾气性格,差不多家庭背景。
听着要找个差不多先生,其实这个差不多说得太婉转了。
g*******u
发帖数: 3948
10
python 的 库
假设有10个集合
每个集合里面 有20个数字
我想看看这几个 集合 的 overlap
有什么好的tool 推荐吗?
thx
g*********5
发帖数: 2533
11
来自主题: Biology版 - some nuclear dye not overlaP with FITC?
I try DAPI, But if scan in the same time, fitc would show DAPI pattern,
anyone know a good dye for nuclear and not overlap with FITC?
o**4
发帖数: 35028
12
来自主题: Biology版 - overlap,用什么软件做啊?
这个能根据overlap的数量大小自动调整图么?
O(∩_∩)O谢谢
o**4
发帖数: 35028
13
来自主题: Biology版 - overlap,用什么软件做啊?
就是两个group,如果重叠的gene多的话,overlap的面积也能随之调整的软件
g***y
发帖数: 201
14
足够了。
我做三个片段连接,
size 500-800bp,
每两个overlap 13bp,
也做成了。
w******n
发帖数: 767
15
具体情况不一样,试一下才知道,overlap区最好不要有错配。
C***Y
发帖数: 61
16

I did some with 18-bp overlap, and most of them worked.
l**********1
发帖数: 5204
17
EN if 15bp=5 amino acid residues that is the conservative amino acid
sequence between different species (i.e.
general fruit fly and house fly and Mediterranean fruit fly
then Overlap PCR 6kp next expression protein is which fly's protein?
d**********9
发帖数: 981
18
来自主题: Biology版 - 求详细的overlap PCR protocol
想将两段不相连的片段通过overlap PCR连接在一起,但是以前没有做过,谁有比较详
细的protocol?
是在普通的PCR之后,再将两段PCR产物extension,然后再用两端的PCR引物作普通的
PCR?无比感谢
r**********d
发帖数: 510
19
I am trying to get a list of zip-codes that dont overlap much. I am
wondering there is easy way to do it? Thanks
r**********d
发帖数: 510
20
I am trying to get a list of zip-codes that dont overlap much. I am
wondering there is easy way to do it? Thanks
B****k
发帖数: 188
21
What do you mean by saying "random"? Do you mean it has no pattern?
If so, the Null could be "the overlapping have the same distribution with
group A (or B)".
D******n
发帖数: 2836
22
More information is needed.
1) are u trying to prove/disaprove that the number 500 is not random or the
fact that those 500 specific genes are chosen is not random?
2) how many genes are there?
if u are just concerned about the numbers and there is not specific prior
for each gene, maybe you are asking the following question:
there are totally n genes, 3000 genes are randomly chosen to be in group A
and 4000 in group B, whats the probably that group A and B has a overlap of
500 or higher?
e*****t
发帖数: 642
23
i said overlapping between these two groups, which means "chosen" is random
or not.
i think i don't worry about 3000 genes are randomly chosen to be in group A
or in group B. They've been already there. I am considering the probability
of choose 500 out of the pool.
I kinda have the idea. Probably conditional prob. will solve the problem.

the
of
t****a
发帖数: 1212
24
You can use fisher exactly test to tell if the overlapping is random. Before
doing this you need to now that the size of the background (the DaShagen's
questions: How many genes are there?). In the following code I just assumed
the background size is 20000, both A and B are sampled from the background.
# R code here.
bg <- 20000; a <- 3000; b <- 4000; ab <- 500
your.data <- matrix(c(ab, a-ab, b-ab, bg-a-b+ab), 2, 2)
colnames(your.data) <- rownames(your.data) <- c('In Group', 'Not In Group')
name... 阅读全帖
S*****0
发帖数: 15
25
来自主题: Statistics版 - How to combine overlapped data
Overlapped data need to be combined to one.
For example:
X Y
----------
1 5
2 6
3 6
7 9
8 10
11 12
Should be converted to:
X Y
----------
1 6
7 10
11 12
[1 5],[2 6] and [3 6] should be combined to [1 6].
[7 9] and [8 10] should be combined to [7 10].
Thanks a lot!
y***g
发帖数: 10422
26
Youtube上还没有全部的测试录像。
从这个New Release视频里看到的一些:
1.Toyota还是一如既往的烂,预料之中。
2.Fusion和TL,S60一样,是滑过去的。
3.Accord没滑过去,实打实地撞上去再弹回来的。看来新Accord是真心的硬。
另外,在这个测试中表现好的,在MODERATE OVERLAP(40%)碰撞中成绩不一定很突出。
看上去两者似乎没太大关系。
K******S
发帖数: 10109
27
unexpected outcomes
In the Jetta test, engineers at the Vehicle
Research Center witnessed a first for IIHS
crash testing when the driver airbag module
detached from the steering column.
The Kizashi’s results also are unique. The
car, which Suzuki introduced in the 2010
model year, is the only midsize moderately priced car to earn a good rating
for structure in the small overlap test.
d******g
发帖数: 6966
28
来自主题: _Auto_Fans版 - IIHS又测了几辆small overlap
"
The Honda Civic 2-door and 4-door, both small cars, and the Volvo XC60, a
midsize luxury SUV, all earned good ratings for small overlap protection.
The Lincoln MKZ, a midsize luxury car, and the Mazda 6, a midsize moderately
priced car, both received an acceptable rating. All are 2013 models except
the Mazda 6, which is redesigned for 2014."
youtube也有新视频xc60,civic,mazda6等
http://www.youtube.com/user/iihs/videos?view=0
y***g
发帖数: 10422
29
来自主题: _Auto_Fans版 - IIHS又测了几辆small overlap
我觉得是这样,对于滑过去的车,25%滑的过去,40%肯定滑不过去。
那么在25%——40%之间应该有个从“滑的过去”到“滑不过去”的临界点X。显然,在
临界点X,安全笼受到冲击力最大(如果“滑不过去”)。但是X等于几,我们不知道。
如果X=38,39,那么我们基本可以用moderate overlap成绩来估计此时的安全性。如果
X=26,27呢?就不容易判断了。
c*********r
发帖数: 19468
30
来自主题: _Auto_Fans版 - IIHS又测了几辆small overlap
actually, in the small overlap test, the driver's head motion is always
biasing to the left because the car is pushed to the right. if you compare
the passat and the accord, you'll find that the accord has the better side
air curtain. it's much bigger and especially, it covers the a-pillar very
well and pops out at the right time so that the driver's head is pushed back
a little bit to hit the frontal airbag. in contrast, the passat's air
curtain is much smaller. even worse, it has a huge gap to... 阅读全帖
f****a
发帖数: 4708
31
来自主题: _Auto_Fans版 - iihs的small overlap测验其实很无聊
small overlap 就是强调安全笼里A柱的重要性,我觉得很好。
y***k
发帖数: 9459
32
来自主题: _Auto_Fans版 - IIHS撞了2016 Audi A6 Small overlap
small overlap 表现不错,全good,其他侧撞和roof strength比奔驰还是差了一个等
级,跟宝马差不多。
c*********r
发帖数: 19468
33
来自主题: _Auto_Fans版 - IIHS撞了2016 Audi A6 Small overlap
三个车正面40%差不多,都算顶级水准,一定要比其实是5-Series最强,但small
overlap 5-Series比另外两个差很多,侧面A6和5-Series算可以接受,E-Class算目前
顶级水准,车顶E-Class>A6>5-Series,不过这项对sedan来说相对没有那么重要……总
体上E-Class>A6>5-Series……
t********i
发帖数: 7856
34
IIHS看来已经决定引入这项测试了。
当然,把市面上所有的车都测一遍也是需要时间的......
IIHS passenger-side small overlap ratings would remedy that situation. The
Institute could start such a program next year and make it a requirement for
one of its safety awards as early as 2018.
g********d
发帖数: 19244
35
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
felixcat (felixcat) 于 (Thu Mar 7 17:01:19 2013, 美东) 提到:
发现有一些人存在误解:认为碰撞测试成绩能代表有没有用高强度/超高强度/极高强度
钢材来造车身,有没有“不计成本”来给好货给消费者。从而一旦发现碰撞测试看上去
不好,就觉得车厂没有用好钢材省成本。
事实上并非这样,我下面列举一些具体的车型的车体结构,大家就能发现一些碰撞测试
成绩很好的车子,事实上并没有用很高强度的材料;而一些碰撞测试让人觉得成绩一般
的车子,事实上却是用了很不错的钢材。造成这种直觉上“对不上号”的原因在于,碰
撞测试成绩不完全取决于钢材硬度,它还跟车体形状、能量传递的设计意图有关。
首先看Audi A4。在small overlap碰撞测试成绩出来之后,这车子的结构强度在公众心
目中马上从天堂掉到了地狱。A柱拦腰截断,这不像话。
但是实际上A4车身框架用料极其足,车身结构有65%是强度超过300 MPa的高强度钢制造
;在这里面又有占全车身18%的材料是强度在500到1... 阅读全帖
w*l
发帖数: 754
36
来自主题: Automobile版 - 安全性能最差的豪华车
America’s Most Dangerous Luxury Cars
August 15, 2012 by Mike Sauter
More than 10,000 people are killed each year in front-end crashes in the
United States. While most cars offer protection in front-end accidents,
overlap crashes, where the car is not hit head-on, are a different matter
entirely. Until now overlap crashes, which account for nearly one in four of
the front-end crashes involving serious or fatal injury to front seat
occupants, have not been tested by the government or other indepen... 阅读全帖
f**d
发帖数: 768
37
来自主题: Neuroscience版 - eBook: From computer to brain
这是一本计算神经科学的优秀著作,全文拷贝这里(图和公式缺),有兴趣的同学可以
阅读
如需要,我可以分享PDF文件(--仅供个人学习,无商业用途)
From Computer to Brain
William W. Lytton
From Computer to Brain
Foundations of Computational Neuroscience
Springer
William W. Lytton, M.D.
Associate Professor, State University of New York, Downstato, Brooklyn, NY
Visiting Associate Professor, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Visiting Associate Professor, Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY
Staff Neurologist., Kings County Hospital, Brooklyn, NY
In From Computer to Brain: ... 阅读全帖

发帖数: 1
38
来自主题: Military版 - 阿三大嘴PPT,你们也信?
http://theprepared.com/blog/no-the-2019-ncov-genome-doesnt-actually-seem-engineered-from-hiv/
2019-nCoV genome doesn’t really seem engineered from HIV
A group of bioinformaticians at two prestigious universities in Delhi, India
, published a preprint scientific manuscript on the bioRxiv preprint server
Friday has led many to speculate wildly that 2019-nCoV may have been
deliberately engineered using HIV protein sequences.
The paper, entitled “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV... 阅读全帖
g********d
发帖数: 19244
39
来自主题: Automobile版 - [合集] MDX和XC90那个更安全?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
siecore (似可) 于 (Fri Dec 6 10:24:50 2013, 美东) 提到:
诚心请教。最近考虑买个SUV。一直以为xc90更安全。但是看iihs的报告,xc90侧撞,b
柱指标是-9.5,而MDX是-16的样子。这不是说xc90被撞进去更深,MDX好像保护乘客更
多?
本来都考虑买xc90了,现在又开始犹豫,甚至highlander的指标都好一些。是不是xc90
太老,实际已经不那么安全了?有高人指点一下,多谢!
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
siecore (似可) 于 (Fri Dec 6 10:42:31 2013, 美东) 提到:
哈,多谢顶贴。那个值是负的越多,变形越浅。如果是0,就表示直接凹到驾驶座中心
了,which means driver is doomed.

☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
mitbbsinus (众生应以十事为善) 于 ... 阅读全帖
t********i
发帖数: 7856
40
来自主题: _Auto_Fans版 - IIHS最近测了几辆车
IIHS最近测了几辆车:
(1) 2017 Chrysler Pacifica
Small overlap:第一次(2016/09以前生产)Restraints and dummy kinematics一项
得了P,把整个small overlap成绩拉到了M。于是赶紧补考,Restraints and dummy
kinematics问题是解决了(G),但是把Structure and safety cage从G拉到了A(不知
道是不是因为这个原因)。不过还好,overall总成绩总算是G。
侧撞-19.5,minivan里最强。超过Honda Odyssey 1厘米。
(2) 奔驰 W205 C-class
40%正面和侧撞早就做过了。这次把剩下的几项也都测完了。不出意外都是G。
亮点是:Roof strength测试SWR居然是7。peak force居然达到了24642 lbs。
24000以上的peak force基本上只有新款的 Luxury/Premier SUV 才能达到(XC90
23349,新Q7 24749,大卵狗 23602)。所以W205 roof stren... 阅读全帖
t********i
发帖数: 7856
41
来自主题: _Auto_Fans版 - IIHS最近测了几辆车
IIHS最近测了几辆车:
(1) 2017 Chrysler Pacifica
Small overlap:第一次(2016/09以前生产)Restraints and dummy kinematics一项
得了P,把整个small overlap成绩拉到了M。于是赶紧补考,Restraints and dummy
kinematics问题是解决了(G),但是把Structure and safety cage从G拉到了A(不知
道是不是因为这个原因)。不过还好,overall总成绩总算是G。
侧撞-19.5,minivan里最强。超过Honda Odyssey 1厘米。
(2) 奔驰 W205 C-class
40%正面和侧撞早就做过了。这次把剩下的几项也都测完了。不出意外都是G。
亮点是:Roof strength测试SWR居然是7。peak force居然达到了24642 lbs。
24000以上的peak force基本上只有新款的 Luxury/Premier SUV 才能达到(XC90
23349,新Q7 24749,大卵狗 23602)。所以W205 roof stren... 阅读全帖
s********u
发帖数: 1109
42
还只是胡思乱想,也不太严谨。欢迎指正。(只讨论目前算法面试题一般涵盖的范围)
前言:
我知道大家都会说当满足最优子结构、subproblem overlap的时候可以用dp。但其实这
个条件个人感觉不太实用。
1.比如不overlap的时候也可以用dp,只是效率不提高,还增加了space cost而已。(
所以这个原则应该是“适合用dp”,而不是“可以用dp”
另外且不说最优子结构,overlap有时候也较难判断,比如boggle game这个,路径一定
是有重复的,但是
subproblem却未必,因为前驱的访问节点会影响后驱节点的"胜利条件"。
2.另外,就算是有overlap,从实用的角度来说,dp(bottom-up)未必方便实现。比如
用DFS来判定二叉树中是否有某个节点(cc150的4.7),bool cover( root, p )本身是
单纯的DFS访问,subproblem不存在overlap;但对整个问题而言,cover不停的调用,
对整个问题而言subproblem存在overlap。同样的还有4.1.因为这两个题目都在DFS中使
用了DFS,递归函数中调用了递归... 阅读全帖
w******t
发帖数: 429
43
这些款式中最新的small overlap test只有XC60做了。 非常不解。 对应的SEDAN都做
了,分数只有VOLVO可以。 应试教育的产物?或者怎么花哨怎么来?
XC60: http://www.iihs.org/ratings/ratingsbyseries.aspx?id=686, all good
X3: http://www.iihs.org/ratings/ratingsbyseries.aspx?id=623, small overlap test没做
Q5:http://www.iihs.org/ratings/ratingsbyseries.aspx?id=667, small overlap test没做
GLK350 : http://www.iihs.org/ratings/ratingsbyseries.aspx?id=712, small overlap test没做
对应的SEDAN
S60, all good
http://www.iihs.org/ratings/ratingsbyseries.aspx?id=412
BMW3, poor o... 阅读全帖
z**n
发帖数: 22303
44
限速(mph)除以十,小于三秒的按三秒计比较合理,可是问题的关键是,国家标准只是
建议,没有强制标准,我就见过限速55的路口黄灯只有三秒的,被抓的小伙子那真是冤
啊。建议你给当地的议员写信投诉他们。
至于你说的那个右转绿箭头红了又绿,明显是技术员水平有问题啊:
Overlap Phase: A special phase unit that has no built-in timing. An overlap
phase is associated with, and receives its timing from, two or more parent
phases. The parent phases control movements that do not conflict with the
movement the overlap phase controls, even though they may conflict with each
other. The overlap phase displays a green whenever any of the paren... 阅读全帖
f******t
发帖数: 7283
45
接下来我们看一看这一代MB S class的车架结构。
从这个图得到的信息是:跟日本标准一样,MB也是采用抗拉强度来标称金属。因此我们
不能直接拿这个数据去跟Audi和BMW比较,因为抗拉强度一般比屈服强度要大,所以比
如说S class的B柱用的1500MPa的金属,假如按照屈服强度来标,就没有1500这么高了。
S Class的车架结构出彩的地方在于B柱和车体两侧两条竖梁都是1500MPa的钢材,跟
LS460对比,LS的B柱用的是980MPa的钢材,这一点不够S Class好。在纵向强度上,S
class是两侧共2条1500MPa的钢粱,而LS则是用4条590MPa的钢粱。
对于A柱,S class用的是550MPa的钢材,而LS用的则是590MPa外加顶部区域440MPa的钢
材。
发动机舱strut tower,S class是用强度仅有300MPa的钢材外加顶部1000MPa加强;
LS460则是用440MPa钢材外加顶部980MPa巩固。发动机舱里两条大梁,S Class是550MPa
的材料,而LS460则是440MPa主体加上顶部是590MPa材料,还有局部980MP... 阅读全帖
j*****z
发帖数: 5306
46
你还提醒了我了,仔细看了一下LEXUS RX350的测试评分,很有意思,RX350 FWD和AWD,
正撞和rollover表现都是4星,但是最后overall的评分,FWD就是4星,属于bottom 62%
,AWD overall是5星。
唯一遗憾的是RX350 AWD 没有做small overlap测试,如果small overlap的得分它能达
到Good or Acceptable,那么它确实安全,如果它只有Marginal or Poor,那么它就会
立刻从这个super-star list里面踢出去,就在一线之间。现在这个model的缺陷就是这
个small overlap测试的车型较少,没有办法很好的做出一个threshold。这些作者在主
页都提到了。随着今后small overlap测试的推广,这个list会发生不小的变化。
同样是top 3%,RX350 AWD缺少small Overlap测试,XC60有small Overlap测试,就现阶
段来说,我个人就会觉得XC60更有保证一些,毕竟一个是未知,一个是已经验证了的。
MDX由于NHTSA的正撞和roll... 阅读全帖
t********i
发帖数: 7856
47
来自主题: Automobile版 - XC60 换 XC90
老XC90(以及其他所有Volvo车型)在small overlap中采取了滑过去的设计。这种设计
确实在真实事故中有利于保护成员,减轻伤害。但也巧妙地掩盖了安全笼设计上的一些
可能的弱点。
small overlap测试标准是25% overlap。对Volvo来说,25%肯定可以滑过去,40%肯定
滑不过去(有moderate overlap测试为证)。那必然在25%和40%之间有个滑得过去和滑
不过去的临界点。这个临界点是多少,也许是26%,也许是39%,但没人知道。
如果到了滑不过去的时候怎么办?那就要看安全笼强度了。moderate overlap正碰测试
的形变参数才有可比较性。大家可以去看看老XC90的moderate overlap测试数据怎么样。
b*****d
发帖数: 61690
48
来自主题: Faculty版 - Two NIH proposal
这是nih policy.
https://public.csr.nih.gov/applicantresources/receiptreferal/pages/
evaluation-of-unallowable-resubmission-and-overlapping-applications.aspx
Two applications with overlapping aims may not be under review at the same
time. An application may not be submitted before the summary statement of an
earlier, overlapping application has been issued.
A resubmission (A1) application may not submitted before issuance of the
summary statement from the review of the previous new (A0) application... 阅读全帖
c***s
发帖数: 70028
49
前总统马英九今天表示,常设仲裁法院认定太平岛是礁不是岛,他非常错愕与愤怒,绝不接受荒谬不公的国际仲裁,他呼吁政府立即提出具体措施,捍卫中华民国的太平岛。
马英九指出,这个法庭的存在,应该是为国际争端定纷息争、避免走上冲突甚至战争。但是,这样的仲裁结果,不但没有排难解纷,反而增加了冲突的可能。「在背後操控的势力,看似赢了面子,其实却输了裡子。」
「菲律宾对中国」南海仲裁案,常设仲裁法院今天公布结果,称中国大陆在9段线范围内主张的历史权利没有法律依据,而南沙群岛的所有海上地物,均为礁岩,包括太平岛在内。
马英九晚间在脸书发文表示,从去年12月到今年5月,包括他在内,150多名部会首长、国内外学者专家和国内外媒体,都访问太平岛,亲眼见证这个淡水充裕(南沙唯一)、农产丰富、生活机能完整的岛屿,完全符合「联合国海洋法公约」第121条关于「岛屿」必须「维持人类生存与自身经济生活」的要件。
他说,至今年4月底为止,也有430篇国际媒体完整陈述「太平岛是岛」的事实。太平岛是「岛」不是「礁」,已是国内外多数人的共识。
马英九指出,70年来,太平岛是在中华民国有效统治之下,对地区提供医疗救难等服务,夙有口... 阅读全帖
y*z
发帖数: 3244
50
来自主题: Military版 - 宣判的原文
The Hague, 12 July 2016
The Tribunal Renders Its Award
A unanimous Award has been issued today by the Tribunal constituted under
Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (the “
Convention”) in the arbitration instituted by the Republic of the
Philippines against the People’s Republic of China.
This arbitration concerned the role of historic rights and the source of
maritime entitlements in the South China Sea, the status of certain maritime
features and the maritime enti... 阅读全帖
首页 上页 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 下页 末页 (共10页)